Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Banks Win Temporary Reprieve from Novel Illinois Swipe-Fee Law

By Thomas Panoff & Maxwell Earp-Thomas on December 23, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FinTech-Blog-Banking-1-660x283

On December 20, 2024, an Illinois federal court, in considering a motion for a preliminary injunction brought by the Illinois Bankers Association, American Bankers Association, and other trade groups, ruled that national banks and federal savings associations will not be subject to Illinois’ groundbreaking law that, starting on July 1, 2025, would forbid card issuers, payment card networks, acquirer banks and payment processors from charging retailers for swipe fees on gratuities and “any use and occupation tax or excise tax” imposed by the State or a local government. (See here and here for our previous discussions on the law).

In siding with the trade association’s member national banks and federal savings associations, the Court temporarily barred enforcement of the Illinois Interchange Fee Prohibition Act, holding that they had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits for their argument that the National Bank Act (“NBA”) and the Homeowners Credit Loan Act preempted the new Illinois statute. The Court ordered supplemental briefing on similar arguments made under the Federal Credit Union Act. In particular, the Court noted how the new law could undermine Congress’s intention to create a uniform national banking system. Notably, the court also emphasized that compliance costs could be prohibitive, potentially forcing some institutions to exit the credit and debit card market. The Court, however, declined to extend such preemption on behalf of payment networks and other “non-national bank or savings association participants.” 

Putting It Into Practice: The Court’s ruling underscores the difficulty of balancing state regulations with federal banking laws, especially in the context of complex payment systems such as credit and debit card networks where there are numerous parties to each transaction. With supplemental briefings and further hearings on the horizon, banks and credit card companies alike should closely monitor this case, as it will likely shape the future of interchange fee regulations and their intersection with federal banking laws. 

Photo of Thomas Panoff Thomas Panoff

Tom Panoff is a partner in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Thomas PanoffEmail
Photo of Maxwell Earp-Thomas Maxwell Earp-Thomas

Max is an associate in the Finance & Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Maxwell Earp-ThomasEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo