Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Consumer Support Outcome: good practices and areas for improvement

By Simon Lovegrove (UK), Anita Edwards, Joe Bamford (UK) & Matthew Gregory (UK) on March 10, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 7 March 2025, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published a new web page which sets out the findings from its review of firms’ approaches to the consumer support outcome of the Consumer Duty. The examples of good practices and areas of improvement are intended to help firms understand the FCA’s expectations.

In May 2024, the FCA carried out an initial quantitative survey of 407 retail financial services firms across the banking, insurance, payments, consumer finance, and investments sectors. It received 356 responses.

The FCA found that most firms were considering how the support they provide meets their customers’ needs.

However, areas for improvement included:

  • Aligning support processes to the target market. The FCA expects all firms – regardless of their size and business models – to design their support services around the needs of their customers. This means understanding their customer base and identifying where there are specific needs. The FCA wants to see firms think innovatively to find new ways of serving customers well.
  • Making post sale support as accessible and effective as pre-sale support. Firms should consider their end-to-end support journeys and not disproportionately focus on pre-sales over after-sales support.
  • Embedding a culture within step of the duty. Some firms were unable to demonstrate substantive steps taken to drive cultural change in line with the Duty. Some firms failed to evidence appropriate training and other measures that enable their staff to understand their role in delivering good outcomes.
  • Monitoring a broader range of outcomes about effective customer support. Some firms relied on transactional metrics, such as contact rates and wait times, or took a solely reactive approach in their monitoring, relying on customer feedback or complaints to identify issues. Where the customer support function is outsourced to a third-party provider, the FCA saw mixed progress of firms implementing effective MI oversight or information flow with the third-party firm.
Photo of Simon Lovegrove (UK) Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Read more about Simon Lovegrove (UK)Email
Photo of Anita Edwards Anita Edwards
Read more about Anita EdwardsEmail
Photo of Joe Bamford (UK) Joe Bamford (UK)
Read more about Joe Bamford (UK)Email
Photo of Matthew Gregory (UK) Matthew Gregory (UK)
Read more about Matthew Gregory (UK)Email
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo