Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

EPA and Army Corps Issue New Guidance for Implementing WOTUS Definition under Supreme Court’s Sackett Decision

By Greg L. Johnson, Clare M. Bienvenu & Colin North on March 14, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Overhead,View,Of,Everglades,Swamp,With,Green,Vegetation,Between,Water

On March 12, 2025, EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued a joint memorandum providing guidance to field staff on implementing the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) as it pertains to “adjacent wetlands.”1 The memorandum represents a new iteration of the decades-old debate on the extent of Clean Water Act (CWA) authority over wetlands adjacent to jurisdictional navigable WOTUS. The previous iteration took place under the Biden Administration after the Supreme Court announced a two-part test in Sackett v. EPA. There, the Supreme Court held that CWA authority over WOTUS extends only to wetlands when: (1) the adjacent body of water is a “relatively permanent body of water connected to traditional interstate navigable waters” and (2) the wetland has “a continuous surface connection with that water, making it difficult to determine where the water ends and the wetland begins.” The new guidance narrows the scope of WOTUS by clarifying the current administration’s interpretation of when a wetland has a “continuous surface connection.”

The new guidance states that CWA authority will not extend to wetlands that are connected to jurisdictional waters by discrete features like non-jurisdictional ditches, swales, pipes, or culverts. It also explicitly rescinds any components of guidance or training materials that assumed a non-jurisdictional discrete feature established a continuous surface connection, citing materials compiled under the Biden Administration. The new guidance from the Trump Administration takes issue with such prior implementation, finding the “discrete features” language in tension with the “continuous surface connection” standard that Sackett set forth. EPA and the Army Corps now state that WOTUS includes “only those adjacent wetlands that have a continuous surface connection because they directly abut the [requisite jurisdictional water] (e.g., they are not separated by uplands, a berm, dike, or similar feature).”

In addition to the new guidance, EPA and the Army Corps issued a notice in the Federal Register regarding their intent to engage with stakeholders and gather recommendations on the meaning of key terms from Sackett, such as “relatively permanent” and “continuous surface connection,” to inform any potential future administrative actions to clarify the WOTUS definition and to ensure transparent, efficient, and predictable implementation.2 Stakeholders have challenged Biden-era implementation of CWA authority over adjacent wetlands in ongoing litigation, and the listening sessions are aimed at ensuring any potential, future action “will reflect consideration of the experiences of, and input received from, landowners, industry groups, the agricultural community, States, Tribes, local governments, community organizations, environmental groups, and the general public.”

The agencies will hold at least six listening sessions, with two open to all stakeholders, one open to States, one open to Tribes, one open to industry and agricultural stakeholders, and one open to environmental and conservational stakeholders. The listening sessions will be held as web and in-person conferences in late March-April 2025. Registration instructions and dates will be forthcoming at the following website here.

The listening sessions may lead to a more robust form of administrative action, such as a rulemaking to amend the existing regulations defining WOTUS, which would be more difficult for a future administration to reverse.

Liskow will be monitoring and covering further actions regarding the WOTUS definition under the new administration on Liskow’s The Louisiana Industrial Insights Hub. For more information on industry impacts and opportunities arising under the new administration, please contact Liskow attorneys Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu, and Colin North.


1Memorandum to the Field Between the Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA Concerning Proper Implementation of “Continuous Surface Connection” Under the Definition of “WOTUS” Under the CWA.

2 WOTUS Notice: The Final Response to SCOTUS.

Photo of Greg L. Johnson Greg L. Johnson

Greg Johnson is an experienced business lawyer with a long record of helping Louisiana companies with the environmental aspects of complex, large-impact transactions, litigation, and regulatory compliance issues throughout the surrounding Gulf Coast region.  A significant focus of Greg’s practice is representing domestic…

Greg Johnson is an experienced business lawyer with a long record of helping Louisiana companies with the environmental aspects of complex, large-impact transactions, litigation, and regulatory compliance issues throughout the surrounding Gulf Coast region.  A significant focus of Greg’s practice is representing domestic and international corporations with environmental permitting for major, high-profile industrial facility projects – such as a proposed, $20 billion gas-to-liquid facility – and with the resolution of often-controversial, high-exposure, oil and gas or energy-related disputes, such as claims in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

Read more about Greg L. JohnsonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Clare M. Bienvenu Clare M. Bienvenu

Clare Bienvenu is an environmental regulatory and litigation lawyer who has practiced in both Louisiana and California, working with clients across the United States. Clare counsels clients regarding complex environmental regulatory, enforcement, and permitting issues spanning the range of federal and state environmental…

Clare Bienvenu is an environmental regulatory and litigation lawyer who has practiced in both Louisiana and California, working with clients across the United States. Clare counsels clients regarding complex environmental regulatory, enforcement, and permitting issues spanning the range of federal and state environmental laws. Clare additionally facilitates the permitting and regulatory aspects of developing new facilities on behalf of energy, petrochemical, and industrial clients. Her substantive environmental experience includes air permitting, hazardous waste regulation, land remediation, land use regulation, coastal regulation, carbon sequestration projects, and renewable energy projects.

Clare has played a key role in various administrative matters, proceedings, and enforcement actions. She has participated in consent decree negotiations and the termination of consent decrees with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Justice, as well as settlement negotiations with the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the California Air Resources Board. Clare has also represented clients in permitting matters involving the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management. She also advises on environmental justice considerations in the context of agency permitting.

Read more about Clare M. BienvenuEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Colin North Colin North

Colin North is an associate in the firm’s Environmental Regulatory practice group. He received his Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law, magna cum laude, from the Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University in 2023. During law school, he…

Colin North is an associate in the firm’s Environmental Regulatory practice group. He received his Juris Doctor and Graduate Diploma in Comparative Law, magna cum laude, from the Paul M. Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University in 2023. During law school, he was a member of the Board of Advocates and participated in the Robert Lee Tullis Moot Court Competition.

Read more about Colin NorthEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    The Energy Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Liskow & Lewis
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo