Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Massachusetts AG Issues New Regulations Targeting Junk Fees 

By A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Beineng Zhang on March 14, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Finance-and-Bankruptcy-Blog-Image_Money-Collage-660x283

On March 3, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell announced new regulations, issued under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, aimed at curbing “junk fees” by requiring businesses to disclose total prices upfront and provide clear information about additional charges. The regulations, set to take effect September 2, 2025, seek to prevent deceptive pricing practices and enhance consumer transparency.

The new regulations impose several requirements on businesses operating in Massachusetts, including: 

  • Total Price Disclosure. Businesses must clearly disclose the full price of a product or service—including all mandatory fees—at the time of advertisement and before collecting consumer information.
  • Fee Transparency. Any additional charges must be itemized, with details on their nature, purpose, and amount. Businesses must also indicate whether they are optional or waivable, along with instructions on how consumers can avoid them. 
  • Trial Offers. Businesses offering free or discounted trials must clearly disclose any charges a consumer may incur, the specific products or services covered, the deadline for cancellation to avoid charges, and simple, accessible cancellation instructions. 
  • Recurring Charges and Subscriptions. Businesses must provide clear terms for recurring charges, including any price changes after a trial period, offer a user-friendly cancellation process, and issue written notices before renewals specifying renewal dates, costs, and cancellation methods. 

To assist businesses in complying with the new regulations, the AG’s Office has released guidance for businesses. 

Putting It Into Practice: Massachusetts’ new regulations are continued evidence of state regulators filling in the gap left by the pullback of federal regulators. States like California have already taken steps to regulate deceptive fee practices (previously discussed here), and we are likely to see additional state-level initiatives.

Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Beineng Zhang Beineng Zhang

Beineng Zhang is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Beineng ZhangEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo