Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

ALERT: Delete, Delete, Delete—FCC Calls for Comment on Which Rules Should be Eliminated

By Brian Weimer, Drew Svor, Austin Shepherd, Emily Dalessio, Ethan Lamb & Taiye Kolawole on March 19, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
GovCon-Blog-Image_Guidelines-660x283

On March 12th, 2025, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issued a Public Notice (“Notice”) seeking comment on which FCC rules should be repealed or modified to alleviate “unnecessary regulatory burdens” and enhance investment and innovation in telecommunications networks. Along with inviting general feedback on which rules to eliminate, the Notice also urges commenters to consider several policy factors in their analysis, including:

  1. Cost-Benefit Considerations: Commenters should consider whether the costs of a regulation exceed its benefits, and whether eliminating or modifying a rule could result in greater benefits.
  2. Experience Gained from Implementation: Commenters should consider whether experience from implementing a rule indicates that it is unnecessary or ineffective in achieving its intended objectives.
  3. Marketplace and Technological Changes: Commenters should consider whether changes in the marketplace or technology have rendered existing rules unnecessary or outdated.
  4. Regulation as a Barrier to Entry: Commenters should consider whether certain regulations potentially hinder competition by imposing unequal costs on large and small businesses.
  5. Changes in the Broader Regulatory Context: Commenters should consider whether changes in other regulatory frameworks or the adoption of industry standards make certain FCC rules unnecessary or inappropriate.
  6. Changes in the Governing Legal Framework: Commenters should consider reviewing rules in light of changes to the statutory provisions they implement or recent legal decisions, such as the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision.
  7. Other Considerations: Commenters should consider situations where case-by-case review would be more appropriate than applying a bright line rule to meet regulatory objectives. Commenters should also consider rules that are no longer operative and rules that are sunsetting or awaiting further review.

Comments are due April 11, 2025 and reply comments are due April 28, 2025.

If you have any questions about the Notice please contact a member of Sheppard Mullin’s Telecommunications Team.

Photo of Brian Weimer Brian Weimer

Brian Weimer is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and Leader of the firm’s Telecom Team and Co-Leader of the CFIUS Team.

Read more about Brian WeimerEmail
Photo of Drew Svor Drew Svor

Drew Svor is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and serves as a member of the firm’s Telecom, Space & Satellite, CFIUS and AI Teams, as well as the D.C. office’s recruiting co-chair.

Read more about Drew SvorEmail
Photo of Austin Shepherd Austin Shepherd

Austin Shepherd is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C., office.

Read more about Austin ShepherdEmail
Photo of Emily Dalessio Emily Dalessio

Emily Dalessio is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Emily DalessioEmail
Photo of Ethan Lamb Ethan Lamb

Ethan Lamb is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. He is also a member of the firm’s CFIUS Team.

Read more about Ethan LambEmail
Photo of Taiye Kolawole Taiye Kolawole

Taiye Kolawole is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about Taiye KolawoleEmail
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    FCC Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo