Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Court Orders CFPB to Reinstate Employees and Resume Operations; CFPB Promptly Files Appeal

By Stefanie Jackman, Jesse Silverman, Chris Willis & Lori Sommerfield on March 31, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer-Financial-Protection-Bureau_1200x600_0008_GettyImages-157582524-768x384

On March 28, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) was ordered by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to reinstate its employees and resume its operations. This decision comes after the CFPB allegedly attempted to shut down its activities, leading to the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) filing a lawsuit questioning the legality of the shutdown. The court held that the CFPB’s actions to halt its operations and terminate its employees were not consistent with its statutory obligations under Title X of Dodd-Frank. As a result, the court granted a preliminary injunction requiring the CFPB to reverse its shutdown efforts, reinstate its workforce, and continue performing its statutory duties. On March 29, the Bureau filed its notice of appeal of the preliminary injunction.

Procedural History

The impetus for the case commenced when the CFPB, under the direction of Acting Director Russell Vought, initiated a series of actions at the CFPB. These actions included issuing a “do no work” order via e-mail, canceling contracts, and terminating employees. The NTEU, representing the affected employees, filed a lawsuit challenging these actions as unlawful and inconsistent with the CFPB’s statutory obligations.

The court issued a consent temporary restraining order on February 14, temporarily halting any further reductions in force, terminations of contracts, or deletion of data. The court held two days of evidentiary hearings on the matter, during which key witnesses, including the CFPB’s Chief Operating Officer, Adam Martinez, testified.

The Preliminary Injunction

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion and issued a preliminary injunction to maintain the agency’s existence until the case is resolved on the merits. A separate order was issued detailing the preliminary injunction requirements.

The order mandates the CFPB to:

  1. Maintain and not delete, destroy, remove, or impair any data or other CFPB records covered by the Federal Records Act.
  2. Reinstate all probationary and term employees terminated between February 10, 2025, and the date of the order.
  3. Not terminate any CFPB employee, except for cause related to the individual employee’s performance or conduct, and not issue any notice of reduction-in-force.
  4. Not enforce the February 10, 2025 stop-work order or require employees to take administrative leave in furtherance of that order.
  5. Provide employees with either fully-equipped office space or permission to work remotely with the necessary technological support.
  6. Ensure the CFPB Office of Consumer Response continues to maintain a toll-free telephone number, a website, and a database for the centralized collection of consumer complaints.
  7. Rescind all notices of contract termination issued on or after February 11, 2025, and not reinitiate the wholesale cancellation of contracts.
  8. File a report with the court by April 4, 2025, confirming compliance with the order.

We will continue to monitor the CFPB’s appeal, its activities and operations, and provide updates.

Photo of Stefanie Jackman Stefanie Jackman

Stefanie takes a holistic approach to working with clients both through compliance counseling and assessment relating to consumer products and services, as well as serving as a zealous advocate in government inquiries, investigations, and consumer litigation.

Read more about Stefanie JackmanEmailStefanie's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Chris Willis Chris Willis

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending…

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending them in individual and class action lawsuits brought by consumers and enforcement actions brought by government agencies.

Read more about Chris WillisEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Lori Sommerfield Lori Sommerfield

With over two decades of consumer financial services experience in federal government, in-house, and private practice settings, and a specialty in fair lending regulatory compliance, Lori counsels clients in supervisory issues, examinations, investigations, and enforcement actions.

Read more about Lori SommerfieldEmailLori's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo