Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Broad Interpretation of CCPA’s Private Right of Action Increases Business Risk to Tracking Technologies Lawsuits

By Payam Khodadadi on May 9, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a recent decision, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has construed the private right of action provision under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) broadly, which increases business risk to tracking technologies lawsuits that are already rampant.

As background, the CCPA (Civil Code §1798.150) limits private rights of action to data security breaches.  Specifically, that section allows a private right of action for any consumer whose nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information, or whose email address in combination with a password or security question and answer that would permit access to the account is subject to an unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure as a result of the business’s violation of the duty to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the information to protect the personal.

The Court construed this provision broadly to include a business’s use of tracking technologies on its website without consent.  Specifically, the Court held that disclosure of personal information to third-party vendors plausibly constitutes an unauthorized disclosure. 

This ruling has a significant impact on businesses by increasing their potential risk for use of third-party vendors that place tracking, marketing and analytics technologies on the business’s website.

While this area is further developed, businesses should review their privacy policies to ensure full, accurate and complete disclosure of their data governance practices, including the use of tracking technologies on their websites, and review or install cookie consent management banners to obtain affirmative consent to the business’s data governance practices.

Photo of Payam Khodadadi Payam Khodadadi

Payam graduated from law school in the top 3% of his graduating class. Payam practices in the areas of data privacy and security, restructuring and insolvency, and complex litigation. In each year from 2013 through 2020, Payam was selected by the prestigious Super…

Payam graduated from law school in the top 3% of his graduating class. Payam practices in the areas of data privacy and security, restructuring and insolvency, and complex litigation. In each year from 2013 through 2020, Payam was selected by the prestigious Super Lawyers publication as a “Rising Star.”

Read more about Payam KhodadadiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Password Protected
  • Organization:
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo