Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Reversals Continue: CFPB Proposes Rescission of Supervisory Designation Amendments

By Jason Cover, Mark Furletti, Stefanie Jackman, Jesse Silverman, Lori Sommerfield & Chris Willis on May 16, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
MortgageLenders_1041512910

On May 14, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB or Bureau) published a proposed rule to rescind amendments to its Procedures for Supervisory Designation Proceedings, originally adopted in 2022 and 2024. This proposal marks a significant shift in the Bureau’s approach to supervising nonbank entities. Public comments on the rescission will be accepted until June 13, 2025.

As background, CFPA § 1024(a)(1)(C) gives the CFPB discretion to supervise nonbanks that do not qualify for supervision under one of the primary grounds in the CFPA (offer/broker/service mortgages, offer student loans, offer small dollar loans, larger market participant). The discretionary supervisory authority can apply to “any [nonbank] covered person who … the Bureau has reasonable cause to determine, by order, after notice to the covered person and a reasonable opportunity for such covered person to respond, based on complaints collected through the system under § 1013(b)(3) … or information from other sources, that such covered person is engaging, or has engaged, in conduct that poses risks to consumers with regard to the offering or provision of consumer financial products or services.”

We previously discussed the CFPB’s use of its “dormant authority” to assert supervisory powers over nonbanks, a move that included publicizing supervisory designations based on perceived consumer risks. This authority was notably exercised in the case of World Acceptance Corp., where the CFPB found reasonable cause to supervise the company due to consumer complaints about its practices.

The Bureau has particular concerns about the manner in which the 2022 and 2024 amendments provided for public release of decisions and orders. Under those amendments, if an entity consented to supervisory designation, then there would be no public release of any decision or order. However, if the entity contested designation, that choice may result in a public decision and order asserting that the entity “is engaging, or has engaged, in conduct that poses risks to consumers.” The Bureau now expresses concerns that these amendments may unduly pressure entities to consent to supervisory designation to avoid public disclosure. This procedural disparity could affect businesses’ reputations, prompting the CFPB to reconsider the necessity of these amendments.

The proposed rescission aligns with recent shifts in CFPB policy under Acting Director Russell Vought, appointed by President Trump. As forecast in its 2025 Supervision and Enforcement Priorities (discussed here), the CFPB’s current focus is moving away from nonbank financial platforms, prioritizing traditional depository institutions instead.

Photo of Jason Cover Jason Cover

Jason’s in-depth experience advising on consumer lending matters both as in-house counsel and outside advisor provides extensive industry knowledge for his financial services clients.

Read more about Jason CoverEmailJason's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Mark Furletti Mark Furletti

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial

…

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial services across numerous industries.

Read more about Mark FurlettiEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Stefanie Jackman Stefanie Jackman

Stefanie takes a holistic approach to working with clients both through compliance counseling and assessment relating to consumer products and services, as well as serving as a zealous advocate in government inquiries, investigations, and consumer litigation.

Read more about Stefanie JackmanEmailStefanie's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Lori Sommerfield Lori Sommerfield

With over two decades of consumer financial services experience in federal government, in-house, and private practice settings, and a specialty in fair lending regulatory compliance, Lori counsels clients in supervisory issues, examinations, investigations, and enforcement actions.

Read more about Lori SommerfieldEmailLori's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Chris Willis Chris Willis

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending…

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending them in individual and class action lawsuits brought by consumers and enforcement actions brought by government agencies.

Read more about Chris WillisEmailChris's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo