Lesson. There is no limitations period for the initiation of proceedings supplemental in Indiana, assuming the motion is filed within 20 years of the entry of the judgment.

Case cite. Converging Capital LLC v. Steglich, 234 N.E.3d 902 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024)

Legal issue. Whether Indiana law imposes a limitations period on the initiation of proceedings supplemental.

Vital facts. A money judgment was entered against debtor in 2006. In 2022, an assignee of the judgment initiated proceedings supplemental (a post-judgment collection motion) against debtor.

Procedural history. On the debtor’s motion, the trial court dismissed creditor’s proceedings supplemental as untimely. Creditor appealed.

Key rules.

  • Proceedings supplemental are a continuation of the original action, not a new action that may trigger certain statutes of limitations.
  • Also, a pro supp is not considered an “execution” on the judgment.
  • Judgments themselves generally survive for 20 years in Indiana.

Holding. The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the case back to the trial court.

Policy/rationale. Debtor argued that a ten-year statute of limitations applied and that creditor had failed to renew the judgment within that ten-year period. But the Court clarified that the ten-year rule related only to the enforcement of a judgment lien on real estate, not to proceedings supplemental generally. Thus, the creditor was permitted to initiate the process to collect.

Related posts.

__________
Part of my practice involves representing banks and lenders in post-judgment collection matters. If you need assistance with a similar matter, please call me at 317-639-6151 or email me at john.waller@dinsmore.com. Also, don’t forget that you can follow me on Twitter @JohnDWaller or on LinkedIn, or you can subscribe to posts via RSS or email as noted on my home page.

Photo of John D. Waller John D. Waller

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of…

John protects the interests of parties when businesses default on loans of all kinds, including; commercial real estate, loans secured by multi-family projects, senior nursing/assisted living facilities, agricultural operations and small businesses. This includes serving as an advocate during the work out of underperforming loans; filing and defending lawsuits to enforce promissory notes, guaranties, and other written contracts; foreclosing mortgages and enforcing personal property security interests; applying for court-ordered receiverships; protecting lien rights in bankruptcy court; purchasing or selling distressed loans; and representing court-appointed receivers.

His practice also includes representing mortgage loan servicers and the corresponding trusts/investors in consumer finance litigation, including contested residential foreclosures, title insurance claims, regulatory violation cases, tax sale disputes, and compliance matters. John also asserts the rights of parties in complex, real estate-related and title litigation and represents companies and individuals in contract disputes.

An AV Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rated lawyer and partner in the Indianapolis office of the national law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, John graduated from DePauw University in 1990 and immediately entered the Indiana University School of Law. In 1993, he received his license to practice in Indiana’s state and federal courts. John later completed an intensive week-long professional training program in trial skills presented by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy. John has represented companies and individuals in a wide variety of disputes. He has tried a number of bench and jury trials, and has handled several appeals. He and his wife have three sons.