Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

State AG News: Federal Funding and Deceptive Practices July 10-16, 2025

By Toni Michelle Jackson & Joanna Rosen Forster on July 22, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Each week, Crowell & Moring’s State Attorneys General team highlights significant actions that State AGs have taken. See our State Attorneys General page for more insights. Below are the updates from July 10-16, 2025:

Multistate

  • A multistate coalition of 15 attorneys general announced that it is withdrawing its motion for a preliminary injunction in New Jersey v. Bondi, a lawsuit to prevent the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) from distributing previously seized Forced Reset Triggers (“FRTs”) back into the community. FRTs are used to turn semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic machineguns and were previously illegal under federal law. Thus, ATF previously seized approximately 12,000 FRTs after extensive retrieval operations. However, ATF reversed course. According to the coalition’s complaint, ATF has dropped pending enforcement actions against individuals who allegedly possessed FRTs and agreed to return seized FRTs back to its previous owners. The coalition stated that it was withdrawing its motion for a preliminary injunction after the Government agreed not to return FRTs to the coalition states. 
  • A multistate coalition of 23 Attorneys General and the governors of Pennsylvania and Kentucky sued the Trump Administration over its decision to freeze $6.8 billion in funding for programs administered by the U.S. Department of Education. Pursuant to federal statutory and regulatory requirements, the Department of Education makes about 25% of funds available to the states on July 1 annually. The freezing of these funds was disclosed in a three-sentence email to plaintiff states on June 30 announcing that the funds are pending a “review,” in part for consistency with the “President’s priorities.” Plaintiff states have alleged that the freeze violates federal statutes governing the federal budgeting process such as the Anti-deficiency Act and Impoundment Control act as well as the separation of powers doctrine of the Presentment clause.
  • A multistate coalition of 22 attorneys general submitted an amicus brief in Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence v. Bondi to support plaintiff’s challenge to conditions placed by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) grants. VAWA grants provide shelter, counseling, legal aid, and other supports to victims of domestic violence. The DOJ recently added new rules to grants by telling organizations that they cannot use funds to “promote gender identity” or “DEI programs.” This has created a confusing landscape as these organizations try to square the new rules with existing rules that organizations must serve all victims and follow anti-discrimination laws. In the amicus brief, the attorneys general argued that preliminary injunctive relief is in the public interest because the funds improve public safety across the United States.

California

  • Attorney General Bonta announced the arraignment of two defendants in a complex fraud scheme where two defendants allegedly defrauded victims of over $1 million in investments for a pizza franchising company. The defendants were charged with 11 counts of Franchise Fraud in violation of the California Corporations Code, 9 counts of Security Fraud, 1 count of Fraudulent Securities Scheme, two counts of Grand Theft, and a “special allegation” of aggravated white collar crimes with losses over $500,000. Between 2020 and 2023, the defendants allegedly solicited money from investors who believed that they were either purchasing public stock options or franchises of a pizza restaurant chain. After receiving funds from the victims, defendants allegedly began closing off and ultimately stopping all communications with victims. Many of the victims had little to no business investment experience and some were over the age of 65.
  • Attorney General Bonta announced that the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted California a temporary restraining order blocking U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) from engaging in allegedly unconstitutional stops of Los Angeles residents during immigration sweeps. AG Bonta alleged that the stops are based on racial profiling, rather than evidence of wrongdoing.

Idaho

  • The Idaho Supreme Court ruled that Attorney General Labrador had authority to investigate alleged misuse of government grants issues to charitable organizations under the Idaho Charitable Assets Protection Act (“ICAPA”), the Idaho Charitable Solicitation Act (“ICSA”), and the Idaho Consumer Protection Act. The ruling reversed the court below which had blocked AG Labrador from obtaining information from 19 grant recipients. The case arose from reports that certain grant funds for studying the impacts of COVID-19 on school aged children were misused. At issue was whether grants fit within the definition of “charitable donations” under ICAPA, ICSA, and the Consumer Protection Act. Because the grants fit within the definition, the Court determined that the AG had authority to demand information from anyone he has reason to believe possess relevant knowledge of suspected violations.

Massachusetts

  • Attorney General Campbell announced a $2.5 million settlement with Delaware-based student loan company Earnest Operations LLC (“Earnest”) over alleged violations of consumer protection and fair lending laws. Earnest used artificial intelligence (“AI”) models to make lending decisions including determining an applicants’ eligibility and their loan terms and pricing. The AI model allegedly led to a disparate impact in approval rates and loan terms, with Black and Hispanic applicants more likely to be penalized than White applicants. AG Campbell further alleged unfair and deceptive conduct related to Earnest’s human-based assessments, automatic denial of applications based on immigration status, sending inaccurate adverse action notices to applicants, and failing to implement policies and procedures to mitigate fair lending risks. As a result, Earnest will pay $2.5 million, implement changes to its business practices, and regularly report to the AG’s Office on its compliance.

Missouri

  • Attorney General Bailey announced that his office launched an investigation and related lawsuits against Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) – foreign-owned proxy advisory firms. The firms specialize in providing voting recommendations to institutional investors on how to vote their shares at corporate shareholder meetings. Glass Lewis and ISS control more than 97% of the U.S. proxy advisory market, which AG Bailey states gives the firms significant influence over American corporate governance. The firms have allegedly promoted progressive environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) and diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) agendas. The AG alleges that these acts violate Missouri’s Merchandising Practices Act.

New Jersey

  • Attorney General Platkin announced administrative actions against nine out-of-state retailers for allegedly shipping alcohol to New Jersey consumers without a license. Seven of the retailers resolved the allegations by agreeing to stop selling into the state without a license and paying a $2,000 penalty. The two remaining retailers were issued Notices of Violation seeking penalties of $4,000 that are still unresolved. These actions were the result of an investigation by the Attorney General and the Division of Consumer Protection’s investigation into out-of-state shipments of alcohol into the state. As part of the investigation, an undercover investigator purchased alcoholic beverages from out-of-state businesses that did not have New Jersey’s licenses for the sale.
Photo of Toni Michelle Jackson Toni Michelle Jackson

Toni Michelle Jackson is a first-chair litigator whose extensive jury and bench trial experience is informed by over 15 years of government service. Clients rely on her to marshal the evidence presented during discovery and either win their case at summary judgment or…

Toni Michelle Jackson is a first-chair litigator whose extensive jury and bench trial experience is informed by over 15 years of government service. Clients rely on her to marshal the evidence presented during discovery and either win their case at summary judgment or try the case and win at trial. In particular, she leads class/collective actions, multidistrict litigations, and other complex litigation in federal and state courts. As chair of the State Attorneys General Practice Group, Toni provides advice and counsel to clients with State Attorneys General matters, including investigations, inquiries and litigation.

Read more about Toni Michelle JacksonEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Joanna Rosen Forster Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from

…

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from complex commercial and white collar matters in areas such as employment, intellectual property, securities and antitrust law, to internal investigations and corporate and M&A transactions. She views her role as both a conflict manager, dispensing advice to avoid adversarial action, and as a tech and business litigator, resolving disputes with her client’s business goals in mind.

Having served as the general counsel and compliance officer of a publicly traded ecommerce platform operating in over 60 countries, Joanna has an appreciation of strategic dispute resolution, investigations, and compliance from a general counsel’s perspective. By understanding how business leaders combine the input of in-house and outside counsel to make decisions, Joanna is able to provide her clients with decisive and efficient legal guidance.

Her practice includes litigating domestic and cross-border complex commercial disputes and advising technology and ecommerce companies on matters related to internet platforms, product launches, market campaigns, and new vertical lines of business, all while advising on foreign and domestic laws that regulate online content, physical products, and the companies that bring them to market. Drawing on her experience as the General Counsel of an online e-commerce marketplace, Joanna also regularly advises and counsels clients on California’s Proposition 65, from prevention and compliance to remediation. Joanna is well-versed in key regulations that impact ecommerce companies, including the EU’s Digital Services Act, the U.S. INFORM Act, and the proposed SHOP SAFE Act, as well as laws and regulations that govern online speech such as the Communications Decency Act, Section 230.

Prior to going in-house, Joanna was the deputy attorney general, Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice. In this capacity, she led large, complex civil matters alleging violations of California’s False Claims Act, Securities Law, Section 17200, Cartwright Act, and other deceptive business practices. She also maintained her own investigations and litigation docket.

Before joining the California Department of Justice, Joanna spent nearly a decade in private practice, where she focused on civil and criminal antitrust and commercial litigation. She also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall in the U.S. District Court for the Central District Court of California.

Read more about Joanna Rosen ForsterEmailJoanna's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    State AG Blog
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo