Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CCPA Enforcement Action Highlights CPPA Focus on Opt-Out Rights, Website Functionality, and Reliance on Service Providers

By Joseph J. Lazzarotti on August 5, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On May 1, 2025, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) issued a Final Order in one of its first public enforcement actions under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), imposing a fine of nearly $350,000 on the business.

An important take away from the Final Order: simply posting a privacy policy is not enough. Businesses must actively monitor, test, and verify that the tools supporting consumer rights are working — even when those tools are managed by third parties.

What Went Wrong?

The CPPA found multiple violations of the CCPA and its implementing regulations. Here are the most notable failures:

1. Non-Functioning “Cookie Preferences Center” Link

Like many retailers, the business used third party tracking software on its website, such as cookies and pixels, to share data about consumers online behavior (a category of personal information) with third parties. The business shared this data for purposes such as analytics and cross-context behavioral advertising. While the business told consumers they could opt out of the sharing of their personal information, the technical infrastructure of their website did not support elections by consumers to do so. In short, opt-out elections simply were not processed correctly for a period of time, 40 days.

According to the CPPA, the business

“would have known that Consumers could not exercise their CCPA right if the company had been monitoring its Website, but [the company] instead deferred to third-party privacy management tools without knowing their limitations or validating their operation.”

2. Failure to Properly Identify Verifiable Requests and Overcollection of Verification Information

The business offered a webform to enable consumers to exercise several of their CCPA rights, including the right to opt-out of the selling or sharing of personal information. However, using the webform to exercise any of those rights required consumers to provide certain personal information, including a picture of the consumer holding an “identity document.” This approach created two problems: (i) it resulted in the collection of sensitive personal information (e.g., a drivers license) to make the request, and (ii) it failed to distinguish requests to opt-out of the sale or sharing of personal information, which are not verifiable consumer requests. In short, according to the CPPA, the webform collected more personal information than necessary for verifiable consumer requests and failed to authenticate consumers in a compliant manner, ultimately leading to complaints from consumers.

Practical Takeaways

This case illustrates the kind of avoidable but costly missteps that any business could make. Conducting an annual review of CCPA compliance, as required under the law, is an obvious step to help ensure ongoing compliance. But here are some more specific items to consider as well:

  • Test your links and forms regularly across devices and browsers. Don’t assume that what’s written in your privacy policy functions properly.
  • Review webforms and verification procedures to ensure they correctly identify, route, and respond to verifiable consumer requests without collecting unnecessary personal data. Also, assess whether backend processes and training support procedures outlined in online privacy policies.
  • Vet and monitor third-party vendors responsible for CCPA compliance tools. Require written assurances of compliance and retain the right to audit their systems and processes, while also checking to ensure the services provided are compliant.
  • Document your due diligence and monitoring to illustrate a focus on compliance. Mistakes happen, but the business can mount a stronger defense to allegations of non-compliance when it can show an ongoing effort to achieve compliance.

Photo of Joseph J. Lazzarotti Joseph J. Lazzarotti

Joe has had the honor of being a part of the AmLaw 100, nationwide law firm, Jackson Lewis, which has 60+ offices around the country, for nearly 25 years. After practicing in the northeast for most of his career, Joe is resident in…

Joe has had the honor of being a part of the AmLaw 100, nationwide law firm, Jackson Lewis, which has 60+ offices around the country, for nearly 25 years. After practicing in the northeast for most of his career, Joe is resident in the firm’s growing Tampa office.

In 2005, as an associate, Joe founded and currently co-leads the firm’s national privacy, cybersecurity, and AI practice groups, which touts 25+ attorneys navigating complex and emerging challenges, particularly around the collection, use, disclosure, and retention of personal information, the deployment of artificial intelligence, and overall governance, risk and compliance in these areas, including FTCA, HIPAA, NIST, CCPA, CPRA, BIPA, GIPA, NY SHIELD, CIPA, etc. Joe has handled hundreds of data breaches, stood up cybersecurity compliance programs, and established AI governance programs.

Read more about Joseph J. LazzarottiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Other, Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Report
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo