Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New York City Pushes Back Compliance Date of Amended Debt-Collection Rules

By A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Beineng Zhang on August 7, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
NY-Commercial-Blog-Images-NYCBuildings-660x283

On July 28, The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) announced that its amended debt-collection rule, scheduled to take effect on October 1, 2025, has been postponed, leaving the industry in limbo for the third time since the rules were finalized in August 2024. DCWP will set a new effective date with at least three months’ advance notice.

DCWP’s amendments, which sit atop the CFPB’s Regulation F, significantly expand disclosure, language access, and record-retention duties for anyone collecting consumer debt in the five boroughs. While the latest delay offers extra implementation time, the substance of the rule remains unchanged.

Key provisions of the amendments include:

  • Contact frequency limits. Collectors may not contact or attempt to contact a consumer more than three times in any seven-day period across all channels, unless collecting for multiple non-affiliated creditors.
  • Opt-in electronic outreach. Email, text, or social-media contact require written, revocable consent and must include a no-cost, one-word opt-out (e.g., “STOP”).
  • Enhanced validation & verification. A detailed validation notice must be mailed within five days of first contact, and collection must pause upon a consumer dispute or verification request and may not resume until written verification is provided within 45 days.
  • Time-barred debt safeguards. For debts beyond the statute of limitations, collectors must first send a written notice disclosing the debt is time-barred and wait 14 days before initiating further contact.
  • Medical-debt credit-reporting ban. Medical debts are prohibited from being furnished to consumer reporting agencies. Disputes on one account extend to related accounts from the same provider within a six-month period.
  • Three-year record-keeping mandate. Agencies must retain searchable logs of all consumer contacts, disputes, complaints, and call recordings for three years after the last collection activity.

Putting It Into Practice: DCWP’s open-ended postponement gives collectors a brief reprieve, but the compliance lift remains steep. Market participants face a moving target and must keep programs designed to meet the rule’s contact caps, consent mechanics, verification timelines, and record-retention duties.

Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Beineng Zhang Beineng Zhang

Beineng Zhang is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Beineng ZhangEmail
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo