Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FDA Final Guidance on PCCP: Streamlining FDA Approval for AI-Enabled Medical Devices

By Linn Foster Freedman & Guest Contributor on August 28, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This post was co-authored by Artificial Intelligence Team member Josh Yoo.

As the federal agency tasked with regulating medical devices, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regularly releases guidance to inform medical device manufacturers how to best achieve FDA approval. The topics in these documents often reflect the agency’s proactive approach toward emerging issues in the medical device space, including cybersecurity and computational modeling.

On December 4, 2024, the FDA provided initial guidance for Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions. Following public input, the FDA issued its final guidance on August 18, 2025, which addresses a practical issue inherent to AI-enabled device software functions (AI-DSF): AI, by design, may need repeated adjustments for optimal function, which may require manufacturers to separately apply for FDA approval for each change prior to implementation. Thus, the guidance explains how manufacturers can submit and receive FDA approval for a predetermined change control plan (PCCP), a document that discloses the manufacturer’s planned changes to AI-DSF. Because the PCCP is filed with the marketing authorization for a device with an AI-DSF, an approved PCCP can allow a manufacturer to prospectively obtain FDA authorization for both the device and its future modifications. At a high-level, the components of a PCCP are:

  • A description of planned modifications to the AI-DSF;
  • The protocol for how the modifications will be developed, validated, or implemented, including data management practices, re-training practices, performance evaluation protocols, and update procedures, for each modification; and
  • An impact assessment of the modifications regarding the safety and efficacy of the AI-DSF.

Detailed recommendations in the guidance further clarify how manufacturers can create a compliant PCCP and meet other obligations that may be impacted by approved modifications. For example, a PCCP may need to include proposed edits to the AI-DSF’s labeling in conjunction with the proposed modifications and disclose cybersecurity risk management processes in the modification protocol. As federal oversight for AI continues to evolve, manufacturers should take note of this final guidance to streamline both immediate and future legal compliance when integrating AI into medical devices.

Photo of Linn Foster Freedman Linn Foster Freedman

Linn Freedman practices in data privacy and security law, cybersecurity, and complex litigation. She is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team, and chairs the firm’s Data Privacy and Security and Artificial Intelligence Teams. Linn focuses her…

Linn Freedman practices in data privacy and security law, cybersecurity, and complex litigation. She is a member of the Business Litigation Group and the Financial Services Cyber-Compliance Team, and chairs the firm’s Data Privacy and Security and Artificial Intelligence Teams. Linn focuses her practice on compliance with all state and federal privacy and security laws and regulations. She counsels a range of public and private clients from industries such as construction, education, health care, insurance, manufacturing, real estate, utilities and critical infrastructure, marine and charitable organizations, on state and federal data privacy and security investigations, as well as emergency data breach response and mitigation. Linn is an Adjunct Professor of the Practice of Cybersecurity at Brown University and an Adjunct Professor of Law at Roger Williams University School of Law.  Prior to joining the firm, Linn served as assistant attorney general and deputy chief of the Civil Division of the Attorney General’s Office for the State of Rhode Island. She earned her J.D. from Loyola University School of Law and her B.A., with honors, in American Studies from Newcomb College of Tulane University. She is admitted to practice law in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Read her full rc.com bio here.

Read more about Linn Foster FreedmanEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences, Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy + Cybersecurity Insider
  • Organization:
    Robinson & Cole LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo