Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

OCC Terminates Two Consent Orders

By A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Maxwell Earp-Thomas on October 2, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
White-Collar-Blog-Image-Records-660x283

On September 18, the OCC announced its monthly enforcement actions for September, which included the termination of a 2023 consent order against a national bank and the termination of a 2020 consent order against a federal savings association. Both terminations followed earlier OCC findings of unsafe or unsound practices and alleged violations of federal banking and consumer protection laws.

The 2023 consent order, issued in October 2023, required the institution to meet higher capital minimums, implement revised capital and strategic planning processes, and maintain detailed project management standards. It also mandated improvements to liquidity and interest rate risk management, adoption of stronger IT controls, and the establishment of formal risk governance for new products and custody account operations. In its September 2025 termination order, the OCC stated that the safety and soundness of the institution and its compliance with laws and regulations did not require the continued existence of the 2023 order.

The 2020 consent order, which replaced an earlier 2011 action, directed a federal savings association to strengthen board and management supervision, establish a comprehensive internal audit program, and implement an enhanced consumer compliance management system. It also required revisions to credit risk administration, appointment and resourcing of a qualified BSA Officer, improvements to BSA/AML internal controls and customer due diligence procedures, and adherence to accurate books and records requirements. The OCC stated that continued maintenance of the order was no longer necessary for the institution’s safety and soundness or legal compliance.

Putting It Into Practice: The OCC continues to drop consent orders once it determines that ongoing enforcement is no longer required for an institution’s safety and soundness or compliance with laws and regulations (previously discussed here). Institutions subject to consent orders should anticipate that the OCC will continue to require extensive corrective measures before termination.

Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Maxwell Earp-Thomas Maxwell Earp-Thomas

Max is an associate in the Finance & Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Maxwell Earp-ThomasEmail
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo