Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Sets 30 Day Deadline for Data Breach Notifications

By Joseph J. Lazzarotti on October 7, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
1759859424-7001-5917-lxb_photoaNrRsB2wLDklxb_photo-
Ahmet Yalçınkaya, Unsplash

Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed SB 446 into law, introducing significant changes to California’s data breach notification requirements. The bill establishes deadlines for notifying consumers and the state’s Attorney General when personal information of California residents has been involved in a data breach.

What’s Changed Under SB 446

Previously, California law required businesses to notify affected individuals of data breaches “without unreasonable delay.” Under SB 446, businesses must notify affected individuals within 30 calendar days of discovering or being notified of a data breach. However, the law includes some flexibility to accommodate the practical realities of incident response. Specifically, businesses may delay notification when necessary for legitimate law enforcement purposes or to determine the full scope of the breach and restore the integrity of data systems.

For breaches affecting more than 500 California residents, existing law requires businesses to notify the California Attorney General. SB 446 adds a deadline for those notifications. Specifically, the California Attorney General must be notified within 15 calendar days of notifying affected consumers of a security breach (again, for breaches affecting more than 500 California residents).

Considerations for Businesses

All 50 states and several cities have breach notification laws, as well as notification requirements under federal law, such as HIPAA and banking regulations. Over the years, many of those laws have been updated in several respects – notification deadlines, definitions of personal information, requirements to provide ID theft services and credit monitoring, etc.  It is imperative to stay on top of these legal and compliance obligations in order to help maintain preparedness.

SB 446 takes effect January 1, 2026, giving businesses a few months to review and update their incident response plans. Organizations handling California residents’ personal information should act now to ensure they can meet the 30-day notification requirement. This includes establishing clear internal procedures for breach detection, assessment, documentation, and notification.

test
Photo of Joseph J. Lazzarotti Joseph J. Lazzarotti

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Tampa, Florida, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) with the…

Joseph J. Lazzarotti is a principal in the Tampa, Florida, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He founded and currently co-leads the firm’s Privacy, Data and Cybersecurity practice group, edits the firm’s Privacy Blog, and is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) with the International Association of Privacy Professionals. Trained as an employee benefits lawyer, focused on compliance, Joe also is a member of the firm’s Employee Benefits practice group.

In short, his practice focuses on the matrix of laws governing the privacy, security, and management of data, as well as the impact and regulation of social media. He also counsels companies on compliance, fiduciary, taxation, and administrative matters with respect to employee benefit plans.

Read more about Joseph J. LazzarottiEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Report
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo