Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC and DOJ Settle with Disability-Advocacy Company for Alleged Illegal Telemarketing Practices

By A.J. Dhaliwal, Mehul Madia & Maxwell Earp-Thomas on October 9, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
FCC-Blog-Telemarketing-2-Image-660x283

On September 30, the FTC and the DOJ announced a settlement resolving allegations that a Massachusetts-based disability-advocacy company and its subsidiary violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule and FTC Act. The FTC alleged that the companies unlawfully contacted consumers through robocalls and calls to numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry to market Social Security Disability Insurance benefits.

According to the complaint, the companies used third-party lead generators to collect consumer information through deceptive websites and then placed automated and misleading calls to consumers nationwide. The settlement requires the companies to implement strict vendor oversight and compliance measures to prevent future violations.

The complaint alleges that the companies:

  • Called numbers on the Do Not Call Registry. The companies allegedly made more than 25.7 million outbound telemarketing calls to consumers on the National Do Not Call Registry without prior express consent.
  • Used illegal prerecorded messages. The defendants allegedly placed millions of robocalls through third-party vendors and call centers without obtaining the written authorization required under the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
  • Misled consumers about the purpose of calls. The FTC claimed that telemarketers falsely represented that they were following up on consumers’ SSDI inquiries to induce them to purchase services.
  • Collected consumer information through deceptive websites. The companies allegedly relied on lead generators that used sweepstakes and coupon websites to collect data without clearly disclosing that it would be used for telemarketing.
  • Failed to oversee third-party vendors. The order requires the companies to monitor and pre-approve all lead-generation materials and to suspend or terminate vendors that mislead consumers.

Putting It Into Practice: Amid a broader federal pullback, the FTC has continued to pursue an active supervision and enforcement agenda (previously discussed here and here). Businesses that engage in outbound calls or rely on third-party leads should ensure that vendors obtain valid consent, scrub call lists against the National Do Not Call Registry, and maintain comprehensive oversight programs.

Photo of A.J. Dhaliwal A.J. Dhaliwal

A.J. is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Read more about A.J. DhaliwalEmail
Photo of Mehul Madia Mehul Madia

Mehul Madia, special counsel in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, provides deep consumer finance and fintech expertise to clients, leveraging more than 15 years’ of public and private sector experience.

Read more about Mehul MadiaEmail
Photo of Maxwell Earp-Thomas Maxwell Earp-Thomas

Max is an associate in the Finance & Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm’s Orange County office.

Read more about Maxwell Earp-ThomasEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Consumer Finance and Fintech Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo