Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Opting Out of Web Tracking Has Never Been Easier in California

By Michael Sutton & Sara Shanti on October 22, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Healthcare-Medical-Security-Blog-Image-660x283

On October 8, 2025, Governor Newsom signed the California Opt Me Out Act (the “Act”) into law, which expands on the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). Most notably, the Act mandates that businesses developing or maintaining internet browsers must include functionalities enabling consumers to automatically communicate their preference to opt out of the sharing or selling of personal information. The functionalities must be readily accessible to consumers and must be “easy for a reasonable person to locate and configure,” which will spare consumers from the hardships of navigating oftentimes confusing mechanics to identify and enable opt outs.

Looking ahead, while the Act is only tailored to apply to the parties that are developing or maintaining a browser, the CCPA currently arms consumers with the right to opt out of the selling or sharing of their personal information, and requires that parties subject to the CCPA honor opt outs that are communicated to them (in some cases, through browser-based signals). Incorporation of easy-to-use functionalities will likely increase the number of opt outs, which regulated parties will be required to honor.

The Act also sends a signal that California is taking additional steps to provide consumers with greater control over how their personal information is sold or shared by businesses and also serves a dual purpose of combatting dark patterns, particularly as it allows consumers to streamline the process of opting out.[1] As California continues to be a trailblazer in expanding consumer control around how their personal information is collected and used, other states will likely adopt similar approaches.

FOOTNOTES

[1] A “dark pattern” generally includes “a user interference designed or manipulated with the substantial effect of subverting or impairing user autonomy, decisionmaking,” such as significant hurdles to opt out processes, adding items to shopping baskets without consent, among other activities. Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(l).

Photo of Michael Sutton Michael Sutton

Michael Sutton is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Dallas office.

Read more about Michael SuttonEmail
Photo of Sara Shanti Sara Shanti

Sara Helene Shanti is a partner in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Sara ShantiEmail
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Healthcare Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo