Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Warning! States Continue to Worry About Social Media and Teens

By Liisa Thomas & Kathryn Smith on November 19, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Advertising-Influencer-Marketing-Blog-Image-660x283

If you thought social media needed a warning label, many state regulators agree. California recently passed a new warning label law, which will take effect on January 1, 2027. That is, unless it is challenged. Meanwhile, Colorado is fighting to keep alive a similar law following a NetChoice challenge. Other states (like Arkansas, California, Florida, Utah, Maryland, Mississippi, Ohio, and Texas) have not been successful, seeing similar laws stopped on First Amendment grounds.

The California law (AB 56, i.e., the Social Media Warning Law) was passed and signed by Governor Newsom last month. When the law takes effect, certain social media platforms must display a large pop-up to users under 18 when the users open the platform for the first time that day. The platforms must then display another warning after three hours, and then every hour thereafter. There is required language for the warning, which mirrors tobacco and alcohol warnings. The law does not contain a private right of action.

Colorado tried something similar in June 2024, but with more frequent pop-ups. Namely, every 30 minutes, as well as pop-ups if the platform is used between 10 pm and 6 am. The law is currently stayed, following a recent challenge from NetChoice. 

Putting it into Practice: These laws highlight state-level activity around children’s online privacy – especially in the perceived absence of federal action. We expect to see this continue in the new year. Companies should keep this in mind, even if they do not run social media platforms. Having a principles-based approach to privacy compliance can help organizations navigate constantly-evolving state regulatory activity.

Photo of Liisa Thomas Liisa Thomas

Liisa Thomas, a partner based in the Chicago and London offices, is Leader of the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group.

Read more about Liisa ThomasEmail
Photo of Kathryn Smith Kathryn Smith

Kathryn (“Katie”) Smith is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office and a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team. She is certified by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) for CIPP/US.

Read more about Kathryn SmithEmail
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Eye On Privacy
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo