Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NCAA Rescinds Rule Change That Would Have Allowed Athletes to Bet on Professional Sports

By Stephen C. Piepgrass & Cole White on December 1, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has abruptly reversed a recently approved rule change that would have permitted college athletes and athletic department staff to bet on professional sports. Under a rarely used override process, more than two-thirds of Division I member schools voted within a 30-day window last month to rescind the proposal. The threshold was reached on November 21, nullifying the rule change before it could take effect. As a result, the longstanding ban on sports wagering by NCAA student-athletes and staff remains in place across all three NCAA divisions. However, even if the rule had been implemented, college athletes and athletic department staff would still have been barred from betting on any NCAA contests, as the rescinded change only concerned wagering on professional sports. The vote to revoke the new rule underscores the NCAA membership’s cautious stance amid an evolving sports betting landscape.

The policy change comes on the heels of several high-profile gambling scandals that have heightened concerns about the integrity of sports wagering. In late October, an NBA head coach and player were arrested in connection with illicit sports betting operations amid allegations that inside information was misused for wagering advantage. College sports have faced their own betting controversies as well: the NCAA recently revoked the eligibility of six Division I men’s basketball players over sports gambling violations, and it disclosed that a former Temple University player placed dozens of bets on his team’s games — including some bets against his own team. According to NCAA officials, enforcement caseloads involving sports betting have spiked in recent years, with at least a dozen more investigations currently underway. These incidents and trends provided a sobering backdrop for NCAA institutions, likely influencing their decision to halt the expansion of permissible betting by athletes and staff.

Why It Matters

From a business and legal perspective, the NCAA’s decision to rescind the professional sports betting exception sends a clear signal that integrity concerns trump the push for betting liberalization within college athletics. Even as sports wagering has become legal and widespread in many states, college athletes and personnel remain strictly forbidden from engaging in any sports betting. This means universities must continue to enforce rigorous compliance policies, and sports betting operators must remain vigilant to prevent bets from prohibited individuals (e.g., by flagging accounts belonging to athletes or coaches). Notably, the NCAA has shown it will actively seek industry cooperation to protect game integrity. For example, the NCAA launched a 2023 campaign urging state regulators and sportsbooks to eliminate proposition bets on college sporting events.

The policy reversal reinforces that all stakeholders in the legal gaming space must prioritize robust integrity measures. Attorneys and compliance professionals advising sports organizations or betting companies should take heed: this rapid policy about-face highlights the dynamic regulatory environment and the paramount importance of safeguarding the fairness of competition in the age of legalized sports betting.

Photo of Stephen C. Piepgrass Stephen C. Piepgrass

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies,

…

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies, including the CFPB and FTC, as well as clients involved with litigation, with a particular focus on heavily regulated industries. He also has experience advising clients on data and privacy issues, including handling complex investigations into data incidents by state attorneys general other state and federal regulators. Additionally, Stephen provides strategic counsel to Troutman Pepper’s Strategies clients who need assistance with public policy, advocacy, and government relations strategies.

Read more about Stephen C. PiepgrassEmailStephen C.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Cole White Cole White

Cole is a member of the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy and Enforcement (RISE) group. He has a decade of experience working in the attorney general community, having joined the firm from the Wyoming Office of the Attorney General, where he was assistant attorney…

Cole is a member of the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy and Enforcement (RISE) group. He has a decade of experience working in the attorney general community, having joined the firm from the Wyoming Office of the Attorney General, where he was assistant attorney general.

Read more about Cole WhiteEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Sports and Gaming
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo