Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Prediction Market Platforms Launch Coalition Focused on Federal Oversight Issues

By Stephen C. Piepgrass & Ayana Brown on December 19, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Popular prediction markets platforms recently announced that they have formed the Coalition for Prediction Markets. According to the coalition’s website, it aims to unite exchanges, brokers, and advocates to expand consumer access to safe, transparent, and integrity-driven prediction markets in the U.S. The coalition contends that prediction markets currently operate under a federal framework, but that framework is being threatened by state regulators “seeking to block consumer access and extend their own authority.” This messaging signals that prediction market operators are prepared to vigorously oppose state regulation in an effort to preserve exclusive federal oversight.

The Washington, D.C.-based coalition lists several policy priorities on its website, including federal clarity and consistency, market integrity and transparency, consumer access and education, and responsible innovation. The coalition’s policy priorities suggest that state interference is amongst its greatest concerns. The coalition contends that state gaming regulators’ attempts to impose gambling-style oversight on federally supervised prediction markets threatens to cause confusion and undermine the existing federal framework governing prediction markets. The announcement of the coalition comes on the heels of heightened scrutiny from state regulators, some of which have taken the position that prediction markets are subject to state gaming regulations. Given the coalition’s stated objectives and growing regulatory scrutiny, prediction market stakeholders should keep an eye on how its activities influence emerging rules and policy debates.

Photo of Stephen C. Piepgrass Stephen C. Piepgrass

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies,

…

Stephen leads the firm’s Regulatory Investigations, Strategy + Enforcement (RISE) Practice Group. He focuses his practice on enforcement actions, investigations, and litigation. Stephen primarily represents clients engaging with, or being investigated by, state attorneys general and other state or local governmental enforcement bodies, including the CFPB and FTC, as well as clients involved with litigation, with a particular focus on heavily regulated industries. He also has experience advising clients on data and privacy issues, including handling complex investigations into data incidents by state attorneys general other state and federal regulators. Additionally, Stephen provides strategic counsel to Troutman Pepper’s Strategies clients who need assistance with public policy, advocacy, and government relations strategies.

Read more about Stephen C. PiepgrassEmailStephen C.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Regulatory Oversight
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo