Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Three States, One Date: Ringing in the New Year with Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island

By Liisa Thomas & Kathryn Smith on January 8, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Privacy-Secure-Info-Blog-Image-660x283

Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island rang in the new year with their comprehensive privacy laws taking effect on January 1, 2026. Almost half of US states now have these fairly similar laws in place. Nuances exist from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, making it more relevant than ever to have an adaptive approach to privacy compliance.

While not a lot in these states is new, there are nuances worth noting. Indiana and Kentucky join seven other states with an opportunity to cure a violation of the law. Which cure period does not expire. Rhode Island, on the other hand, does not give an opportunity to cure. Rhode Island’s law applies if the company has information of 35,000 residents. While this is a lower threshold than many other states, the state itself is less populated.

Other requirements to keep in mind are that consumers in those locations will now have access, correction, deletion, and portability rights. In Indiana, the correction obligations are limited to information the person submitted. Companies should also keep in mind that these residents now have certain controls over targeted advertising and sensitive data (e.g., health, religion). As in all states except Iowa and Uta,, high-risk profiling, sensitive information, selling data, and targeted advertising triggers a Data Protection Impact Assessment.

Putting it into Practice: These three are among the more “business-friendly” of the comprehensive privacy laws. Nevertheless, as the number of states with this obligations grow, having an adaptive and principles-based approach to compliance gives companies more flexibility. This is especially true as several states (for example, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Montana, and Oregon) have demonstrated a willingness to amend laws after taking effect.

Photo of Liisa Thomas Liisa Thomas

Liisa Thomas, a partner based in the Chicago and London offices, is Leader of the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group.

Read more about Liisa ThomasEmail
Photo of Kathryn Smith Kathryn Smith

Kathryn (“Katie”) Smith is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office and a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team. She is certified by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) for CIPP/US.

Read more about Kathryn SmithEmail
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Eye On Privacy
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo