Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Oral Argument Scheduled in Hazardous Substance Designation Litigation

By Vanessa Pinto on January 14, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Following the completion of briefing in the challenge to EPA’s rule designating PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), oral argument has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 20, 2026. 

On January 7, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted Respondent-Intervenors’ unopposed motion setting the format for the oral-argument.  Under the Court’s Order 20 minutes are allotted to Petitioners, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., 15 minutes to Respondent, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and 5 minutes to Respondent-Intervenors, Clean Cape Fear, Environmental Justice Task Force, Fight for Zero, Merrimack Citizens for Clean Water, and Natural Resources Defense Council.  The panel considering these consolidated cases will consist of Circuit Judges Millett, Katsas, and Rao.

We will continue monitoring this case and provide updates.  The case is Chamber of Commerce of the USA et al v. EPA, D.C. Cir., 24-01193 (consolidated with 24-1261, 24-1266, 24-1271, 24-1272). 

  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    PFAS and Emerging Contaminants
  • Organization:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo