Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CalPrivacy Doubles Down on Data Brokers

By Liisa Thomas & Kathryn Smith on January 26, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Universal Blog CA

CalPrivacy followed up on its threat from last year to focus on data brokers. This month it settled with Rickenbacher Data LLC for failure to register as a data broker. The company is a Texas-based company that operates as Datamasters, and – according to CalPrivacy – buys and resells personal information to facilitate targeted advertising.

The stipulated order indicated that the company bought and sold lists that disclosed health conditions like Alzheimer’s and drug addiction. Lists were promoted based on sensitive classes. The website promoted, for example, a “senior list” and a “Hispanic list.” The Board emphasized that these activities took place in 2024 without the proper registration required under California law. After being contacted by CaPrivacy, the company registered as a data broker -but denied that it was a data broker as it did not sell Californians’ personal information (although it did receive it).

CalPrivacy found that although Datamasters tried to fall outside of California’s law by scrubbing out Californian’s information, the process in which it did that was “imperfect.” The agency concluded that the company was subject to – and had violated – California’s Delete Act. It imposed a $45,000 fine, and the company agreed not to sell Californian’s personal information. The company also agreed to put in place sufficient policies and procedures in place to ensure that any Californians’ information that it does receive is deleted.

Putting it into Practice: For data brokers looking to avoid being subject to the Delete Act, this case is a cautionary tale. It demonstrates not only the focus California has on data broker activity -and the need to register- but also the steps it expects companies to take to remove Californians’ information from their databases should they be trying to stay outside of the laws’ requirements.

Photo of Liisa Thomas Liisa Thomas

Liisa Thomas, a partner based in the Chicago and London offices, is Leader of the firm’s Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group.

Read more about Liisa ThomasEmail
Photo of Kathryn Smith Kathryn Smith

Kathryn (“Katie”) Smith is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office and a member of the Privacy and Cybersecurity Team. She is certified by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) for CIPP/US.

Read more about Kathryn SmithEmail
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Eye On Privacy
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo