Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CMS’s 2027 Medicare Advantage Proposal: “Flat” Rates with Tighter Risk Adjustment

By Virginia Bell Flynn & Chad R. Fuller on February 6, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, AI Health, digital healthcare provider, telemedicine, medical technology

On January 26, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year 2027 Advance Notice of Methodological Changes for Medicare Advantage (MA) capitation rates and Medicare Part D payment policies. CMS projects a net average year‑over‑year MA payment change of just 0.09% — roughly a flat environment once medical trend, utilization, and other pressures are considered. CMS frames the proposal as improving “payment accuracy and sustainability,” with a focus on aligning payments more closely with actual beneficiary risk and care rather than documentation intensity.

What CMS Is Proposing
CMS proposes to update the MA risk‑adjustment model to reflect more current cost patterns and, critically, to exclude diagnoses reported only through “unlinked” chart review records (diagnosis codes not tied to a specific beneficiary encounter) from risk‑score calculations starting in 2027. For MA organizations that rely heavily on retrospective chart reviews to support risk‑adjustment eligible diagnoses, this change could materially reduce risk scores and revenue.

On the Part D side, CMS proposes parallel changes: updating the risk‑adjustment model to account for Inflation Reduction Act benefit changes, reflecting more recent drug cost data, excluding unlinked chart review diagnoses, and separately calibrating payments for MA‑prescription drug plans and stand‑alone prescription drug plans to improve.

How CMS Frames the Direction of Travel
In the Advance Notice, CMS describes three principles for risk adjustment going forward: simplicity to reduce administrative burden, competition based on creating value for patients regardless of plan size, and payments that accurately reflect beneficiary health risk while supporting program integrity. Taken together, the message is that risk adjustment should be driven by encounter‑based clinical information, not by documentation strategies untethered to care, even if those strategies have been permissible in the past.

Next Steps
CMS will accept comments on the Advance Notice until February 25, 2026, and must publish the final Rate Announcement by April 6, 2026. While CMS has sometimes moderated proposals in response to stakeholder feedback, the overall direction is unlikely to change.

Photo of Virginia Bell Flynn Virginia Bell Flynn

Virginia is a first chair litigator with a diverse practice, representing clients in the health care and financial services sectors. Her managed health care work is focused on defending insurers, managed care organizations, and plan administrators in complex multiparty and single-plaintiff litigation. Virginia…

Virginia is a first chair litigator with a diverse practice, representing clients in the health care and financial services sectors. Her managed health care work is focused on defending insurers, managed care organizations, and plan administrators in complex multiparty and single-plaintiff litigation. Virginia helps clients navigate a range of claims, including bad faith, breach of contract, ERISA, the Mental Health Parity Act (MHPA), out-of-network, and issues arising under common law. As a go-to advisor for some of the largest companies in the U.S., Virginia has litigated matters in more than 21 states.

Read more about Virginia Bell FlynnEmailVirginia Bell's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Chad R. Fuller Chad R. Fuller

Chad is a partner in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice with a primary focus in financial services litigation. He is an accomplished trial attorney who has served as lead counsel in state and federal courts across the country in which he represents…

Chad is a partner in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services practice with a primary focus in financial services litigation. He is an accomplished trial attorney who has served as lead counsel in state and federal courts across the country in which he represents clients in consumer class actions and general business litigation. Chad has particular speciality with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and has also broadened his practice into more traditional areas of health care litigation.

Read more about Chad R. FullerEmailChad R.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo