Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Oregon Calls Out Noncompliant Producers as Packaging EPR Enforcement Era Begins

By Karlie Webb, Shawn Zovod, Tim Carlstedt, Liz Glusman & Chelsey Noble on April 16, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued a list of companies that are allegedly noncompliant “producers” under Oregon’s extended producer responsibility (EPR) law for packaging and paper products, known as the Recycling Modernization Act (RMA). The list appeared on the Circular Action Alliance’s (CAA) website on April 10, 2026. The CAA is the “Producer Responsibility Organization” that is charged with implementing EPR programs in Oregon, Colorado, and California.

The lengthy list includes companies from a broad range of sectors, from food and beverage manufacturers to fishing gear suppliers. According to DEQ and CAA, each listed producer was first contacted by CAA regarding alleged noncompliance and given 90 days to respond. When those producers did not respond, DEQ issued a formal notice and provided an additional 30‑day window to come into compliance. Companies that still failed to act after this second opportunity now appear on the published list.

Noncompliance under Oregon’s RMA carries potentially significant exposure of up to $25,000 per day, per violation. Since the program is new, however, key enforcement questions remain unanswered. For example:

  • Will a single day of failing to report to the CAA be treated as one violation, or could it be counted multiple times as a failure to meet several distinct obligations under the law?
  • Will selling products into Oregon without complying with the RMA be considered one violation per day, per sale, or even per product?
  • How will DEQ treat good-faith efforts — such as a “producer,” that registers but miscalculates its “covered materials” — as compared to a producer that fails to register at all?

The timing of DEQ’s list is also notable. The list was released shortly after the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon upheld and clarified the scope of a preliminary injunction in the litigation challenging the RMA, National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors v. Feldon, et al. The court’s April 6 order clarified that the state is barred from enforcing the RMA only against the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors (NAW) and entities that were NAW members as of February 6, 2026.

Companies that are not NAW members, or that joined NAW after February 6, 2026, remain fully subject to RMA enforcement. For those producers, DEQ’s new list is a clear signal that Oregon intends to move from program design to active enforcement, and that now is the time to assess compliance status and potential risk.

Photo of Karlie Webb Karlie Webb

Karlie assists clients in all areas of environmental compliance for existing operations and environmental due diligence for real estate and equity transactions. Clients turn to Karlie when they are acquiring a property or company, and then rely on her environmental compliance counsel post-acquisition.

Read more about Karlie WebbEmail
Photo of Shawn Zovod Shawn Zovod

Shawn’s practice focuses on sophisticated environmental and natural resources law and strategy, with deep experience in the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and their California counterparts, the Porter-Cologne Water…

Shawn’s practice focuses on sophisticated environmental and natural resources law and strategy, with deep experience in the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and their California counterparts, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, California ESA, and Lake and Streambed Alteration program. She is well versed in the preparation of environmental documents under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and advises clients on Environmental, Social and Governance and climate-related reporting.

Read more about Shawn ZovodEmailShawn's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Tim Carlstedt Tim Carlstedt

Tim solves complex environmental compliance and permitting issues for manufacturers, energy companies, insurers, and other regulated entities throughout the United States.

Read more about Tim CarlstedtEmail
Photo of Liz Glusman Liz Glusman

Liz navigates clients through a variety of complex environmental compliance areas to manage risks, achieve strategic business goals, and stay ahead of the evolving regulatory landscape.

Read more about Liz GlusmanEmail
Photo of Chelsey Noble Chelsey Noble

Chelsey focuses her practice on environmental law, specifically on natural resources. She supports clients from diverse industries in adhering to environmental laws and regulations. Chelsey provides creative and strategic counsel in litigation and transactional matters and conducts thorough due diligence.

Read more about Chelsey NobleEmail
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    Environmental Law & Policy Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo