Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

CIT Orders Depositions of CBP and BIS in Section 232 Exclusion Challenge

By Nithya Nagarajan, Cortney Morgan & Eric Dama (Former Husch Blackwell Attorney) on April 17, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Gavel on cargo containers. Represents legal compliance in international trade. Symbolizes justice, law, and regulations in the import/export industry. Shows trade agreements.

On April 15, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) ordered U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) and the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) to sit for depositions in a case filed by an importer seeking refunds of tariffs imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (“Section 232”).

The importer and plaintiff, G&H Diversified Manufacturing LP, originally filed a complaint seeking to overturn CBP’s denial of G&H’s exclusion request for steel tubes imported in 2020. A major issue in the case is whether CBP made a preliminary classification decision related to G&H’s steel tubes prior to BIS’s exclusion determination.

As a result, the CIT ordered the depositions of CBP and BIS related to the two agencies’ role in evaluating Section 232 steel exclusion requests. In its order, the CIT limited the scope of discovery originally sought by G&H, but still ensured that G&H is entitled to obtain certain relevant documents and communications between the two agencies, the process for making determinations on the relevant exclusion requests, and certain policies, procedures, and training documents used by BIS. This is the first time the CIT has ordered depositions in a case related to the steel Section 232 exclusions process.

The Husch Blackwell International Trade and Supply Chain team will continue to monitor and provide updates on this case as they become available. If you have company specific questions or concerns, please contact your Husch Blackwell attorney.

Tags: Trump Tariffs
Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.

Read more about Nithya NagarajanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Cortney Morgan Cortney Morgan

An experienced attorney in the area of international trade and supply chain issues, Cortney advises foreign and domestic clients on all aspects of international trade regulation, planning and compliance, including import (customs), export controls, economic sanctions, embargoes, international trade agreements and preference programs.

Read more about Cortney MorganEmailCortney's Linkedin Profile
Eric Dama (Former Husch Blackwell Attorney)

For assistance or to connect with a member of our team, please visit our Contact Us page.

Email
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    International Trade Insights
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo