Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Federal Court Vacates $100,000 H-1B Fee

By Aimee Guthat, John E. Exner, IV, Amy L. Peck & Otieno B. Ombok on June 9, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Takeaways

  • A federal district court has struck down the $100,000 fee the Trump Administration imposed on certain H-1B petitions.
  • The court ruling could allow affected beneficiaries of approved H-1B petitions obtain visas and travel to the U.S. without having to pay the exorbitant fee.
  • The government is expected to consider appellate options, and employers should continue to monitor developments.

On June 8, 2026, in State of California et al. v. Noem et al. (1:25-cv-13829), a federal district court in Massachusetts ruled that the $100,000 fee President Donald Trump imposed on certain H-1B petitions constitutes an unlawful tax and vacated the fee in its entirety.

President Trump’s Sept. 19, 2025, Presidential Proclamation, “Restriction on Entry of Certain Nonimmigrant Workers,” introduced a new $100,000 fee requirement for new H-1B petitions for foreign workers outside the United States.  The fee was one of several administrative and policy changes the Trump Administration has sought to implement with the aim of restricting and tightening rules surrounding the H-1B nonimmigrant visa program.  The fee was set to expire after one year, if not extended.

In its June 8 decision, the court referenced the recent SCOTUS ruling striking down the President’s tariffs, stating that the president does not have unilateral authority to impose taxes without congressional approval. The court declared the proclamation implementing the $100,000 fee unlawful and vacated the fee in its entirety, effective immediately.

The court also issued declaratory relief in favor of the plaintiffs but declined to enter a permanent injunction, concluding it was not necessary.

For employers, the practical impact of the court’s decision will depend largely on the outcome of any appellate review and how USCIS responds. However, the ruling vacates the $100,000 fee requirement for impacted H-1B petitions, potentially allowing employers to pursue H-1B sponsorship through consular notification without incurring the additional charge. Employers and foreign nationals who postponed H-1B sponsorship or related immigration plans as a result of the fee may now have options available in light of the court’s decision.

Jackson Lewis attorneys will continue monitoring developments, including any government appeals or further USCIS action.

Tags: Trump Tariffs
Photo of John E. Exner, IV John E. Exner, IV

John E. Exner, IV is a principal in the Los Angeles, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice is primarily dedicated to the representation of businesses and individual clients in a variety of employment-based and family-based immigration matters, as well as workplace compliance.

Read more about John E. Exner, IVEmail
Photo of Amy L. Peck Amy L. Peck

As co-leader of the firm’s Immigration group, Amy Peck plays a pivotal role in ensuring the group’s attorneys—and the firm—achieve optimal success for employers on any immigration matter. She believes strongly in Jackson Lewis’ collegial culture and sets the tone for a work…

As co-leader of the firm’s Immigration group, Amy Peck plays a pivotal role in ensuring the group’s attorneys—and the firm—achieve optimal success for employers on any immigration matter. She believes strongly in Jackson Lewis’ collegial culture and sets the tone for a work environment that expects, encourages, and celebrates collaboration among not just the practice group, but others across the firm as well.

Amy loves to dive into complex immigration and compliance issues in the workplace, especially those that intersect employment and immigration law. She approaches client service with the understanding that businesses need practical advice that take a 360-degree view. Amy is especially effective when confronted with a difficult and unique problem to solve for a client. In today’s regulatory environment, Amy is aware that every fact has an impact, and a proactive approach is the best protection.

Read more about Amy L. PeckEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Immigration
  • Blog:
    Immigration Blog
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo