Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

MSHA Makes Changes to the Citation Conferencing Process

By Donna Pryor on June 22, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) recently released changes to the conferencing system. The new structure centralizes authority under national supervisors rather than local District Managers.

Under 30 CFR Part 100, Section 100.6, mine operators have ten calendar days from receipt of a citation or order to request a safety and health conference. Until recently, these conferences were handled at the district level, with Conference Litigation Representatives (CLRs) reporting to their respective District Managers who had authority to approve settlements.

Recently, MSHA implemented changes to how conferences are administered and centralized this process. National supervisors now oversee all CLR dockets and approve all settlements nationwide. CLRs report to these national supervisors instead of District Managers, shifting how conference requests are processed and decided. Citations are now reviewed outside the issuing inspector’s direct supervisory chain, resulting in a more independent review of the issues raised.

The most immediate practical change for mine operators is where conference request must be sent. Rather than directing requests to individual district managers, parties may now email requests for review to the regional Conference and Litigation Representative mailbox. The email address for conferencing citations in the Rocky Mountain region is msha.den.clr@dol.gov. See Rocky Mountain Conference Request Letter. Inspectors should be providing operators with updated conference information during the inspections.

This change presents several benefits. National review may promote more consistent application of MSHA enforcement policies across districts, while review by someone outside the issuing inspector’s direct chain of command may lead to more impartial settlement decisions.

Please contact a Husch Blackwell Workplace Safety & Health attorney with any questions about this new process.

Written with the assistance of Elise Cloonan, a summer associate in Husch Blackwell’s Denver office.

Photo of Donna Pryor Donna Pryor

A member of Husch Blackwell’s Energy & Natural Resources group, Donna focuses on commercial and administrative litigation related to mine safety and occupational safety and health. She also assists clients in crisis management and strategic communications related to workplace health and safety issues.…

A member of Husch Blackwell’s Energy & Natural Resources group, Donna focuses on commercial and administrative litigation related to mine safety and occupational safety and health. She also assists clients in crisis management and strategic communications related to workplace health and safety issues.

Donna has extensive experience in the production of precious metals, aggregates, cement, industrial minerals, coal, salt, potash, phosphate, granite, limestone, and oil and gas. She combines her legal skills and government knowledge with her litigation prowess for clients facing complex problems.

Read more about Donna PryorEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Safety Law Matters
  • Organization:
    Husch Blackwell LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo