Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

ESMA Public Statement on end of MiCA transitional period

By Simon Lovegrove (UK) & Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) on June 24, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 23 June 2026, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) issued a Public Statement calling on unauthorised crypto-asset service providers to wind down orderly, while also safeguarding clients’ interests, as the transitional period under the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) ends on 1 July 2026.

In the Public Statement ESMA states that it expects unauthorised crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) to take immediate steps to wind down their EU activities in an orderly manner, while also safeguarding clients’ interests and mitigating risks to market integrity. In particular, unauthorised CASPs must:

  • Immediately stop onboarding new EU clients, refrain from opening new client relationships or accounts, and cease marketing activities and solicitation.
  • Limit the provision of services to actions necessary to sell or transfer crypto-assets, reallocate assets, or close positions. Custody of clients’ crypto-assets can only continue for the period strictly necessary to complete an orderly exit.
  • Communicate clearly, promptly and repeatedly with clients (retail and institutional) about the measures taken to safeguard their assets and the wind-down plans so that clients know the timeline to dispose of, transfer, reallocate or close their positions. CASPs’ communications should include a deadline by which any residual positions would be closed automatically and information about client protection requirement.

ESMA also reminds CASPs established outside the EU that they cannot provide MiCA services to EU clients or solicit EU clients. This also applies in a business-to-business context. In this regard, ESMA reminds that MiCA prohibits CASPs from outsourcing or delegating certain services, notably custody, to entities that are not authorised as CASPs.

ESMA reminds clients of unauthorised CASPs, whether EU or non-EU entities, that they do not benefit from MiCA safeguards, including protections for client assets.

Photo of Simon Lovegrove (UK) Simon Lovegrove (UK)
Read more about Simon Lovegrove (UK)Email
Photo of Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)
Read more about Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)Email
  • Posted in:
    Technology and AI
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo