Overview

Estate planning has always adapted to new forms of wealth. Historically, planners have focused primarily on real estate, securities, and closely held businesses. Today, an increasing number of clients own digital assets ranging from cryptocurrency to tokenized investment interests. At the same time, blockchain technology is beginning to influence how ownership records, business succession, and estate administration may be managed in the future.

While blockchain technology is not replacing wills and trusts, it is creating new planning opportunities and new risks that estate planners, CPAs, and financial advisors should understand.

Blockchain Is More Than Cryptocurrency

Many people equate blockchain with Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. In reality, blockchain is simply a decentralized digital ledger that securely records ownership and transactions. Rather than being controlled by a single institution, copies of the ledger are maintained across a network of computers, making the records highly secure, transparent, and extremely difficult to alter.

For estate planners, blockchain’s greatest value is not replacing wills, trusts, or other traditional estate planning documents. Those instruments will continue to be governed by state law. Instead, blockchain offers a powerful tool for improving recordkeeping, documenting ownership, and preserving asset histories.

As estates increasingly include digital assets – such as cryptocurrency, online businesses, digital intellectual property, and cloud-based financial accounts – maintaining accurate records becomes more important. Blockchain can provide a permanent, verifiable record of ownership that helps fiduciaries identify assets and reduces the risk that valuable property will be overlooked or disputed during estate administration.

For farmers, ranchers, and closely held business owners, blockchain may also enhance documentation of business interests, equipment, inventories, and other assets. While technology is still evolving, its greatest promise lies not in replacing traditional estate planning, but in complementing it by creating secure and reliable ownership records for both traditional and digital assets.

Digital Assets Are Property

One of the most significant developments came in 2014 when the IRS issued Notice 2014-21,[1] concluding that virtual currency is property, not currency, for federal income tax purposes. As a result, the familiar tax rules governing basis, gain, loss, gifts, and inheritance generally apply to cryptocurrency just as they do to other capital assets.

That classification has important estate planning implications. Cryptocurrency owned at death becomes part of the decedent’s gross estate and generally receives a basis adjustment under the normal rules applicable to inherited property.

The IRS later expanded its guidance in Revenue Ruling 2019-24,[2] addressing the tax consequences of hard forks and airdrops. While the ruling primarily concerns income tax issues, it reinforces the principle that digital assets are property subject to the traditional tax rules governing ownership and control.

Estate Planning Challenges

Unlike traditional financial assets, digital assets often exist only through cryptographic keys known only to the owner. If those private keys are lost, the assets may be permanently inaccessible.

Accordingly, estate plans involving cryptocurrency should include procedures for:

  • identifying digital assets;
  • securely storing access credentials;
  • authorizing fiduciary access;
  • maintaining appropriate cybersecurity; and
  • documenting ownership.

Simply listing cryptocurrency in a will is often insufficient if no one can actually access the assets after the owner’s death.

Fiduciary Access

RUFADAA establishes rules governing when executors, trustees, agents acting under powers of attorney, and conservators may obtain disclosure of or manage digital assets a person’s digital assets. Although the statute does not automatically grant unlimited access, it provides a legal framework that did not previously exist.

Estate planners should ensure that estate planning documents expressly authorize fiduciaries to manage digital assets whenever appropriate.

Note: Because RUFADAA is a relatively recent statute, there is little reported appellate case law interpreting its provisions. Consequently, practitioners must rely primarily on the statutory language, the Uniform Law Commission’s official comments, and evolving guidance from custodians and state probate courts.[4] 

Business Succession Opportunities

Blockchain technology may eventually become valuable for family-owned businesses, including farming and ranching operations.

Many agricultural operations now involve multiple LLCs, partnerships, corporations, and trusts. Membership interests often transfer over several generations through gifts, sales, redemptions, and inheritances. Maintaining accurate ownership records can become increasingly difficult.

Blockchain technology offers the potential to maintain secure, time-stamped ownership records documenting transfers, valuations, restrictions, and ownership percentages. Such records could simplify future transitions and reduce ownership disputes among family members.

Similarly, recording a cryptographic “hash” of important legal documents – such as operating agreements, buy-sell agreements, or trust amendments – could provide evidence that the document has not been altered after execution while preserving confidentiality.

Smart Contracts

Another developing application of blockchain technology involves so-called “smart contracts.” Despite the name, a smart contract is not necessarily a legal contract. Rather, it is computer code programmed to automatically perform specified actions when predetermined conditions are satisfied. For example, funds could be released automatically upon the occurrence of a particular event, or periodic payments could be made without further human intervention.

Although still in the early stages of widespread adoption, smart contracts may eventually assist with installment sales, lease payments, business succession agreements, royalty distributions, and certain aspects of trust administration. By automating routine transactions, they have the potential to reduce administrative costs, improve efficiency, and minimize disputes over whether contractual obligations have been fulfilled.

Nevertheless, practitioners should remember that a smart contract is only as good as the legal agreement underlying it. Technology cannot cure poor drafting, resolve ambiguities, or substitute for careful legal planning. Traditional contract principles and sound estate planning remain essential, with blockchain serving as a tool to implement—not replace—a well-crafted legal arrangement.

Proceed With Caution

Despite its promise, blockchain is not a substitute for traditional estate planning. The technology cannot resolve family conflicts, determine tax consequences, or replace carefully drafted wills and trusts. Moreover, many legal issues – including evidentiary standards, cybersecurity, valuation, and fiduciary responsibilities – continue to evolve.

Estate planners should also recognize that technology changes much faster than estate plans. A trust drafted today may remain in effect for decades. Planning techniques that depend upon a particular software platform or technological standard should therefore be approached cautiously.

Estate planners increasingly emphasize express authorization in wills, trusts, and powers of attorney because RUFADAA gives priority to a user’s directions (including online tools provided by custodians) over more general fiduciary powers.

Conclusion

For most clients, blockchain technology should be viewed as a supplement to and not a replacement for traditional estate planning.

The real estate planning issues today involve identifying digital assets, ensuring fiduciaries have legal authority to access them, protecting private keys, and understanding the federal tax rules governing cryptocurrency and other blockchain-based property. Looking ahead, blockchain technology may also improve business succession planning by providing secure ownership records and document authentication.

As more wealth is held in digital form, estate planners who understand both the technology and the tax law will be better positioned to help clients protect and transfer their assets efficiently. For now, however, the fundamentals of estate planning remain unchanged: careful drafting, thoughtful succession planning, and attention to the client’s objectives continue to be the keys to a successful estate plan.


[1] 2014-16 IRB 938, as modified by Notice 2023-34, 2023-19 IRB 837.

[2] 2019-44 IRB 1004.

[3] See, e.g., Texas Estates Code, Title 4, Chapter 2001.

[4] Courts generally require fiduciaries to satisfy the statute’s procedural requirements before ordering disclosure by a custodian.  Courts continue to recognize that the Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. §§2701-2712) limits disclosure of the content of electronic communications absent the user’s consent or another statutory exception. RUFADAA was drafted specifically to work alongside—not override—the federal statute.

Photo of Roger McEowen Roger McEowen

Roger A. McEowen is the Professor of Agricultural Law and Taxation at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas.

Through 2015, he was the Leonard Dolezal Professor in Agricultural Law at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, where he was also the…

Roger A. McEowen is the Professor of Agricultural Law and Taxation at Washburn University School of Law in Topeka, Kansas.

Through 2015, he was the Leonard Dolezal Professor in Agricultural Law at Iowa State University in Ames, Iowa, where he was also the Director of the ISU Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation (CALT), which he founded.  Under his leadership, CALT utilized no taxpayer funds in its operations and fully funded staff salaries and benefits, as well as office rent, equipment and supplies, and travel costs from funds generated by seminars and other education-related events and materials.  At ISU he also introduced an agricultural law course into the undergraduate curriculum initially as an experimental course, ultimately building the course from the ground-up to almost 100 students in attendance by the spring semester of 2015.  He was also the highest rated speaker at the annual fall CALT tax schools every year through 2015.  Before joining Iowa State in 2004, he was an associate professor of agricultural law and extension specialist in agricultural law and policy at Kansas State. From 1991-1993, McEowen was in the full-time practice of law with Kelley, Scritsmier and Byrne in North Platte, Nebraska.

McEowen also teaches an undergraduate course in agricultural law at Kansas State University, and has been a visiting professor of law at the University of Arkansas School of Law in Fayetteville, Arkansas, teaching in both the J.D. and L.L.M. programs. He has also previously taught at Washburn Law School and the Drake University School of Law Summer Institute in Agricultural Law.

He has published scholarly articles in the Journal of Agricultural Taxation and LawIndiana Law ReviewDrake Journal of Agricultural LawNorth Dakota Law ReviewNebraska Law ReviewMonthly Digest of Tax ArticlesTax Notes, West’s Social Security Reporting System, Toledo Law ReviewWashburn Law JournalCreighton Law ReviewAgricultural Law Update, and the Agricultural Law Digest. He is the author of Principles of Agricultural Law, an 850-page textbook/casebook that is updated twice annually, and a second 300-page book on agricultural law. His Agricultural Law and Taxation Blog, part of the Law Professor Blogs Network, contains approximately 130 detailed and fully annotated articles annually and is the most widely read agriclultural law and taxation blog online.  In mid-2017, Prof. McEowen’s new book, Agricultural Law in a Nutshell, was published by West Academic Publishing Co.  McEowen also authors the monthly publication, “Kansas Farm and Estate Law.” In addition, he co-authors Bureau of National Affairs (BNA) Tax Management Portfolios on the federal estate tax family-owned business deduction and the reporting of farm income, and is the lead author of a BNA portfolio concerning the income taxation of cooperatives.  He is also the Editor of the Iowa Bar Tax Manual, and Estate Planning for Farmers and Ranchers and Family Business Organizations, both Thomson/West publications.

Prof. McEowen conducts approximately 80-100 seminars annually across the United States for farmers, agricultural business professionals, lawyers, and other tax professionals. He also conducts two radio programs each airing twice monthly heard across the Midwest and on the worldwide web.  In addition,his two-minute radio program, “The Agricultural Law and Tax Report,” is heard each weekday by over 2 million listeners on farm radio stations from NY to CA as well as SiriusXM 147. He also can be seen as a weekly guest on RFD-TV where he discusses various agricultural law and tax topics with the RFD-TV hosts.

In 2003, McEowen was named the recipient of the American Agricultural Law Association (AALA) Distinguished Service Award, becoming the youngest recipient in AALA history.  He is also the recipient of the AALA’s award of excellence for professional scholarship. In 2006, McEowen was named the President-Elect of the AALA.

He received a B.S. with distinction from Purdue University in Management in 1986, an M.S. in Agricultural Economics from Iowa State University in 1990, and a J.D. from the Drake University School of Law in 1991.

He is a member of the Iowa and Kansas Bar Associations and is admitted to practice in Nebraska. He is also a past member of the AALA Board of Directors.