On July 28, 2026, the FCC added foreign-produced power inverters and advanced robotic devices to its Covered List, following determinations by an executive branch interagency body that they pose “unacceptable risks” to the national security of the United States. The new additions continue a string of decisions placing entire categories of foreign-produced devices on the Covered List of restricted equipment—beginning with the FCC’s December 2025 addition of all foreign-produced unmanned aircraft systems (a/k/a drones) and continuing with the March 2026 addition of all foreign-produced routers. The definitions of power inverters and advanced robotic devices are broad, seeming to reach inverters used in electrical systems such as commercial solar, battery, and wind-power projects, home solar and battery systems, and electric-vehicle chargers, and advanced robotic devices such as humanoid and quadruped robots, and robotic vacuums, pool cleaners, and lawn mowers.

The definition of “foreign-produced” also continues to remain broad. Notably, for the first time in a Covered List addition, the FCC and national security agencies have defined this key term to be synonymous with “any article that does not qualify as a ‘domestic end product’” under the Buy American Act (BAA). This change coincides with a broader push across the federal government to emphasize the BAA and other Made in USA initiatives. For additional information on the BAA, see Covington’s alert here.

Effective immediately, the addition of foreign-produced power inverters and advanced robotic devices to the Covered List prevents new models from receiving FCC equipment authorization—making them ineligible to be imported or marketed for use or sale in the United States. The ban is not absolute, however. Devices currently authorized by the FCC can continue to be imported for use and sale, absent future action to the contrary. In addition, companies can apply for “Conditional Approval” for new foreign-produced power inverters from the Department of War (DoW) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or new foreign-produced advanced robotic devices from DoW, which can be granted upon determination that the devices do not pose unacceptable risks. Applying for and obtaining a Conditional Approval requires submitting detailed corporate information and manufacturing and supply-chain information, and committing to some onshoring in the form of a “detailed, time-bound plan to establish or expand manufacturing in the United States” for the device or class of devices for which approval is sought.

The additions of inverters and routers followed quickly on the heels of other actions to expand use of the FCC’s equipment authorization process in service of national security and related goals. Most notably, on July 22, 2026, the FCC adopted a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on “dangerous equipment.” The Report and Order, among other changes, expands the scope of the Covered List to include logic-based hardware components produced by covered entities and places significant new obligations on certain online marketplaces (e.g., to display the FCC ID of equipment listed). The Proposed Rulemaking seeks comment on at least 20 topics, including multiple proposals for new obligations on equipment manufacturers. These include, for example, a proposed requirement to submit software and hardware bills of materials to the FCC as part of certification applications, additional obligations on online marketplaces, and a requirement to register all self-authorized (SDoC) equipment with the FCC.

This class-based approach to the Covered List reflects the Administration’s increasing treatment of economic security and industrial policy as core national-security priorities. Like drones and routers, inverters and robotics were added to the Covered List because the Executive Branch interagency body determined that they posed a range of unacceptable national security risks, including cybersecurity vulnerabilities that could enable remote commandeering, access to sensitive personal, camera, and sensor data that can be highly valued by foreign intelligence services, and a dependence on foreign inputs that can create chokepoints exploitable by foreign actors to constrict supplies of critical components or alter or degrade functionality.

These national-security concerns are not new but instead have been steadily growing for years. We have seen the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and Team Telecom seek to mitigate transactions presenting such risks with respect to Chinese equipment and services, including through commitments involving equipment and vendor screening, domestic manufacturing, and supply-chain integrity. The continued class-based approach to the Covered List thus marks another standalone national-security authority—like the Department of Commerce’s Information and Communications Technology and Services Program and the Department of Justice’s Data Security Program—that has grown out of risks addressed through CFIUS and concerns about the limits of its case-by-case reviews.

The real-world impacts of this class-based approach to the Covered List occur at all levels of the supply chain—from manufacturers and producers, to distributors and commercial end-users, and to investors. These class-based additions frequently mark the first time that many companies and industries are exposed to national-security regulation. A deep understanding of often-unfamiliar national security considerations and the highly technical FCC rules for equipment authorization are critical to navigating this emerging regulatory space. Companies throughout the supply chain for these devices should take steps now to ensure compliance and minimize business disruptions. Manufacturers, distributors, end-users, and investors alike should map supply chains and equipment-authorization requirements for pipelines of new products and device updates, consider contractual provisions to allocate risks related to the Covered List, and evaluate potential regulatory and policy strategies for affected devices.

Photo of Devin DeBacker Devin DeBacker

Drawing on senior career and political roles at the White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ) across three presidential administrations, Devin DeBacker advises clients at the intersection of national security, geopolitical risk, regulatory oversight, and complex commercial transactions and technology.

Devin’s practice…

Drawing on senior career and political roles at the White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ) across three presidential administrations, Devin DeBacker advises clients at the intersection of national security, geopolitical risk, regulatory oversight, and complex commercial transactions and technology.

Devin’s practice spans the full range of investment- and transaction-based national security reviews and related regimes, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS); Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Team Telecom reviews of telecommunications infrastructure, equipment, and services; the DOJ’s Data Security Program; the Department of Commerce’s Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) program and related supply-chain authorities; the Department of the Treasury’s Outbound Investment Security Program; the FCC’s Covered List of prohibited foreign-produced equipment and services; and emerging and novel uses of economic national security tools such as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and the Defense Production Act (DPA).

From 2019 to 2026, Devin held senior roles in national security and international trade and investment in the White House and DOJ. As Associate Counsel and Special Assistant to the President in the first Trump Administration, he advised the President’s most senior aides and other White House and agency leaders on presidential actions, policies, agency regulations and actions, and other matters involving economic national security, including foreign investment, tariffs and other trade actions, cybersecurity and data privacy, and national-security controls on technology, manufacturing, and supply chains under IEEPA, the DPA, and other authorities. Later in the administration, he served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General in DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, where he advised the White House, DOJ leadership, and other Executive Branch lawyers and policymakers on significant regulatory, statutory, and constitutional issues involving national security, economic and trade sanctions, telecommunications, cybersecurity, and presidential authorities.

From 2022 to 2026, Devin was the Chief of the Foreign Investment Review Section in DOJ’s National Security Division, ultimately serving as the Department’s most senior career official for transactional national security matters. In that capacity, he led the Department’s regulatory national security work involving global business, investment, trade, and technology, including in more than 1,600 CFIUS reviews and over 250 Team Telecom matters while chairing Team Telecom on behalf of the Attorney General. In addition, he oversaw compliance and enforcement for more than 200 national security agreements and multiple presidential prohibitions, including several CFIUS penalties, the first FCC penalties for Team Telecom violations, the government’s first affirmative lawsuit to enforce a Presidential divestment order, and CFIUS’s intervention in multiple bankruptcy proceedings. As the lead career DOJ national security official on broader investment and transactional matters, Devin was the principal architect of DOJ’s Data Security Program (DSP) and also worked closely with other agencies in developing and implementing emerging national security authorities. These include the addition of foreign-produced drones and multiple Chinese manufacturers and service providers to the FCC’s Covered List, the ICTS ban on Kaspersky Labs and the Connected Vehicles Rule, and development of outbound investment rules, the Federal Acquisition Security Council, the Department of Defense’s 1260H List and Section 889 authority, the BIOSECURE Act, and the Federal Trade Commission’s Protecting Americans’ Data from Foreign Adversaries Act (PADFAA).

At the outset of the second Trump Administration, Devin also served as interim head of the National Security Division — the highest-ranking national security official at DOJ. He led the Division’s nearly 400 personnel during the presidential transition and helped shape early administration priorities on China, Iran, trade, foreign investment, sanctions, and export controls.

His government service was recognized by Justice Department leadership for his “exceptional EQ” in navigating “the policy dynamics within the Department, White House, and interagency,” as well as for his leadership in “spearheading some of the most significant policy initiatives” in national security that have shaped the regulatory landscape that businesses now face.

Photo of Jennifer Johnson Jennifer Johnson

Jennifer Johnson is a partner specializing in communications, media and technology matters who serves as Co-Chair of Covington’s Technology Industry Group and its global and multi-disciplinary Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) Groups. She represents and advises technology companies, content distributors…

Jennifer Johnson is a partner specializing in communications, media and technology matters who serves as Co-Chair of Covington’s Technology Industry Group and its global and multi-disciplinary Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) Groups. She represents and advises technology companies, content distributors, television companies, trade associations, and other entities on a wide range of media and technology matters. Jennifer has three decades of experience advising clients in the communications, media and technology sectors, and has held leadership roles in these practices for more than twenty years. On technology issues, she collaborates with Covington’s global, multi-disciplinary team to assist companies navigating the complex statutory and regulatory constructs surrounding this evolving area, including product counseling and technology transactions related to connected and autonomous vehicles, internet connected devices, artificial intelligence, smart ecosystems, and other IoT products and services. Jennifer serves on the Board of Editors of The Journal of Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Law.

Jennifer assists clients in developing and pursuing strategic business and policy objectives before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Congress and through transactions and other business arrangements. She regularly advises clients on FCC regulatory matters and advocates frequently before the FCC. Jennifer has extensive experience negotiating content acquisition and distribution agreements for media and technology companies, including program distribution agreements, network affiliation and other program rights agreements, and agreements providing for the aggregation and distribution of content on over-the-top app-based platforms. She also assists investment clients in structuring, evaluating, and pursuing potential investments in media and technology companies.

Photo of Matthew DelNero Matthew DelNero

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy…

Matt DelNero provides expert regulatory counsel to companies of all sizes in the telecommunications, technology and media sectors. As a former senior official with the FCC and longtime private practitioner, Matt helps clients achieve their goals and navigate complex regulatory and public policy challenges.

Matt serves as co-chair of Covington’s Technology & Communications Regulation (“TechComm”) Practice Group and co-chair of the firm’s Inclusion initiative.

Matt advises clients on the full range of issues impacting telecommunications, technology and media providers today, including:

Structuring and securing FCC and other regulatory approvals for media and telecommunications transactions.
Obtaining approval for foreign investment in broadcasters and telecommunications providers.
Broadband funding under federal and state programs, including under the FCC’s Universal Service Fund (USF) and NTIA’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program.
Representing broadcasters, media networks, and other content owners and producers on both existing and proposed FCC regulations and policies.
FCC enforcement actions and inquiries.
Online video accessibility, including under the Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Equipment authorizations for IoT and other devices.
Spectrum policy and auctions, including for 5G.
Privacy and data protection, with a focus on telecommunications and broadband providers.

Matt also maintains an active pro bono practice representing LGBTQ+ and other asylum seekers, as well as veterans petitioning for discharge upgrades—including discharges under ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and predecessor policies that targeted LGBTQ+ servicemembers.

Prior to rejoining Covington in January 2017, Matt served as Chief of the FCC’s Wireline Competition Bureau. He played a leading role in development of policies around net neutrality, broadband privacy, and broadband deployment and affordability under the federal Universal Service Fund (USF).

Chambers USA ranks Matt within “Band 1” in his field and reports that he is a “go-to attorney for complex matters before the FCC and other federal agencies, drawing on impressive former government experience.” It also quotes clients who praise him as “an outstanding regulatory lawyer…[who] understands the intersection between what’s important for the client’s operations and how the law impacts those operations.”

Photo of Michael Wagner Michael Wagner

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and…

Mike Wagner represents companies and individuals in complex compliance and enforcement matters arising in the public procurement context. Combining deep regulatory expertise and extensive investigations experience, Mike helps government contractors navigate detailed procurement rules and achieve the efficient resolution of government investigations and enforcement actions.

Mike regularly represents contractors in federal and state compliance and enforcement matters relating to a range of procurement laws and regulations. He has particular experience handling investigations and litigation brought under the civil False Claims Act, and he routinely counsels government contractors on mandatory and voluntary disclosure considerations under the FAR, DFARS, and related regulatory regimes. He also represents contractors in high-stakes suspension and debarment matters at the federal and state levels, and he has served as Co-Chair of the ABA Suspension & Debarment Committee and is principal editor of the American Bar Association’s Practitioner’s Guide to Suspension & Debarment (4th ed.) (2018).

Mike also has extensive experience representing companies pursuing and negotiating grants, cooperative agreements, and Other Transaction Authority agreements (OTAs). In this regard, he has particular familiarity with the semiconductor and clean energy industries, and he has devoted substantial time in recent years to advising clients on strategic considerations for pursuing opportunities under the CHIPS Act, Inflation Reduction Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.

In his counseling practice, Mike regularly advises government contractors and suppliers on best practices for managing the rapidly-evolving array of cybersecurity and supply chain security rules and requirements. In particular, he helps companies assess and navigate domestic preference and country-of-origin requirements under the Buy American Act (BAA), Trade Agreements Act (TAA), Berry Amendment, and DOD Specialty Metals regulation. He also assists clients in managing product and information security considerations related to overseas manufacture and development of Information and Communication Technologies & Services (ICTS).

Mike serves on Covington’s Hiring Committee and is Co-Chair of the firm’s Summer Associate Program. He is a frequent writer and speaker on issues relating to procurement fraud and contractor responsibility, and he has served as an adjunct professor at the George Washington University Law School.

Photo of Yaron Dori Yaron Dori

Yaron Dori has over 25 years of experience advising technology, telecommunications, media, life sciences, and other types of companies on their most pressing business challenges. He is a former chair of the firm’s technology, communications and media practices and currently serves on the…

Yaron Dori has over 25 years of experience advising technology, telecommunications, media, life sciences, and other types of companies on their most pressing business challenges. He is a former chair of the firm’s technology, communications and media practices and currently serves on the firm’s eight-person Management Committee.

Yaron’s practice advises clients on strategic planning, policy development, transactions, investigations and enforcement, and regulatory compliance.

Early in his career, Yaron advised telecommunications companies and investors on regulatory policy and frameworks that led to the development of broadband networks. When those networks became bidirectional and enabled companies to collect consumer data, he advised those companies on their data privacy and consumer protection obligations. Today, as new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) are being used to enhance the applications and services offered by such companies, he advises them on associated legal and regulatory obligations and risks. It is this varied background – which tracks the evolution of the technology industry – that enables Yaron to provide clients with a holistic, 360-degree view of technology policy, regulation, compliance, and enforcement.

Yaron represents clients before federal regulatory agencies—including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Department of Commerce (DOC)—and the U.S. Congress in connection with a range of issues under the Communications Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and similar statutes. He also represents clients on state regulatory and enforcement matters, including those that pertain to telecommunications, data privacy, and consumer protection regulation. His deep experience in each of these areas enables him to advise clients on a wide range of technology regulations and key business issues in which these areas intersect.

With respect to technology and telecommunications matters, Yaron advises clients on a broad range of business, policy and consumer-facing issues, including:

Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things;
Broadband deployment and regulation;

IP-enabled applications, services and content;
Section 230 and digital safety considerations;
Equipment and device authorization procedures;
The Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA);

Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) requirements;

The Cable Privacy Act
Net Neutrality; and
Local competition, universal service, and intercarrier compensation.

Yaron also has extensive experience in structuring transactions and securing regulatory approvals at both the federal and state levels for mergers, asset acquisitions and similar transactions involving large and small FCC and state communication licensees.

With respect to privacy and consumer protection matters, Yaron advises clients on a range of business, strategic, policy and compliance issues, including those that pertain to:

The FTC Act and related agency guidance and regulations;
State privacy laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act, the Colorado Privacy Act, the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act, and the Utah Consumer Privacy Act;
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA);
Location-based services that use WiFi, beacons or similar technologies;
Digital advertising practices, including native advertising and endorsements and testimonials; and

The application of federal and state telemarketing, commercial fax, and other consumer protection laws, such as the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), to voice, text, and video transmissions.

Yaron also has experience advising companies on congressional, FCC, FTC and state attorney general investigations into various consumer protection and communications matters, including those pertaining to social media influencers, digital disclosures, product discontinuance, and advertising claims.

Photo of Evan Chiacchiaro Evan Chiacchiaro

Evan Chiacchiaro is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and member of the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

Evan advises clients on a range of technology regulatory issues, including emerging artificial intelligence compliance matters and compliance with Federal Communications Commission…

Evan Chiacchiaro is an associate in the firm’s Washington, DC office and member of the Technology and Communications Regulation Practice Group.

Evan advises clients on a range of technology regulatory issues, including emerging artificial intelligence compliance matters and compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations. Evan also maintains an active pro bono practice focused on civil rights.