Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

House Bill Would Deliver Class-Level Transparency on Proxy Votes

By Carlos E. Juarez on August 19, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
More from this series? Click the link https://istockphoto.6q33.net/9WQVxj
Adam Śmigielski, Unsplash

Recently, Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.) introduced the Multi-Class Stock Company Voting Transparency Act, which directs the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to improve the transparency of voting results at companies with multi-share classes and strengthen the quality of information available to investors.  Specifically, the bill would require companies with two or more classes of stock to provide vote tallies that include a breakdown of results by class. According to the Council of Institutional Investors (“CII”), the number of companies with dual-class or multi-class stock has increased, with a third of companies that completed an IPO in 2025 having two or more classes of stock.  Multi-class structures allow founders, executives, and early investors to retain voting control over corporate decisions even after selling a significant portion of the company’s equity to public shareholders.  Proponents argue that these structures insulate management from short-term market pressures and enable the company to pursue its long-term strategic vision without interference.

Currently, under Item 5.07 of Form 8-K, companies are required to disclose the aggregate vote tallies for each matter submitted to a shareholder vote, including votes for, against, or withheld, as well as abstentions and broker non-votes, within four business days after the meeting.  The bill would require multi-class companies to disclose the total number of votes cast for, against, or withheld, disaggregated by voting class as well as the total number of abstentions and broker non-votes disaggregated by voting class.  In a statement, Rep. Casten noted that “Investors deserve to know whether the board’s response to the outcome of a proposal reflects the preferences of the majority of shareholders—or whether super vote shareholders swayed the results.”

Read the full bill and Rep. Casten’s press release.

Carlos E. Juarez

Carlos Juarez is an Associate in Mayer Brown’s New York office and a member of the Capital Markets practice.

EmailCarlos E.'s Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities, Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    Across The Board
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo