What is an arbitration agreement? An arbitration agreement is a contract provision, or a separate agreement, in which parties agree to resolve covered disputes through arbitration instead of a court proceeding. The agreement can establish the disputes subject to arbitration, the rules governing the proceeding, and the process for selecting an arbitrator.
Arbitration moves a dispute from the public court system to a private proceeding before a neutral arbitrator. The Federal Arbitration Act generally requires courts to enforce written arbitration agreements involving commerce, subject to limited grounds for revoking a contract.
The terms matter because an arbitration agreement can affect where a dispute proceeds, who decides it, and what procedures apply. A party should understand those terms before signing the agreement.
Understanding the Basics of Arbitration Agreements
An arbitration agreement commits the parties to resolve specified disputes through arbitration. Instead of presenting the dispute to a judge or jury, the parties present their claims and evidence to an arbitrator who issues a decision.
Businesses may include arbitration provisions in employment agreements, service contracts, commercial agreements, and other contracts. The agreement can apply to future disputes or, in some circumstances, an existing dispute. The scope depends on the language the parties adopted.
A well drafted agreement addresses practical questions before a dispute arises. It can identify the disputes covered, select an arbitration provider, establish procedures for choosing an arbitrator, identify the location of the proceeding, and allocate arbitration costs and attorney fees.
How Arbitration Differs from Traditional Court Proceedings
Arbitration replaces a court proceeding with a private dispute resolution process. An arbitrator serves as the decision maker, rather than a judge or jury. The parties may also have more control over the procedures and selection of the arbitrator.
Arbitration can provide a less formal process and may resolve a dispute faster than some court cases. The proceeding generally remains private, while court proceedings typically create a public record.
The tradeoffs matter. Arbitration can limit the ability to appeal an unfavorable decision, and the parties may incur arbitrator and administrative fees. The agreement should therefore make the process and financial obligations clear before a dispute begins.
Key Components of an Enforceable Arbitration Agreement
An enforceable arbitration agreement must clearly establish the parties’ agreement to arbitrate. The contract should identify the disputes covered by arbitration and set out the basic rules for resolving those disputes. Clear drafting reduces uncertainty when a dispute arises.
The agreement may address the arbitration provider, location, governing procedures, selection of the arbitrator, allocation of costs, and whether the arbitrator’s decision will bind the parties. These provisions can materially affect how the dispute proceeds and what each party must pay.
Federal law generally favors enforcement of written arbitration agreements falling within the Federal Arbitration Act. A court can refuse enforcement on grounds that would allow a party to challenge the validity of a contract under applicable law, such as fraud or duress.
Scope of Disputes and Selection of Arbitrators
The scope provision determines which disputes the parties must arbitrate. Broad language can cover a wider range of claims, while narrower language can limit arbitration to specific disputes or contractual issues.
The agreement should also establish how the parties will select the arbitrator. Some agreements name an arbitration organization and incorporate its procedures. Others establish a separate selection process. The parties should also address the location and rules governing the proceeding.
These details can shape the cost, timing, and procedure of the arbitration. A party should review them before signing because the agreement may limit the ability to bring covered disputes in court.
Pros and Cons of Signing an Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement can give parties a private and potentially more streamlined way to resolve disputes. It can also limit procedural rights and create costs outside the court system.
The main advantage involves control over the dispute process. Arbitration can provide a private proceeding, allow the parties to participate in selecting the arbitrator, and use procedures tailored to the agreement or applicable arbitration rules. Some disputes may also reach resolution faster than comparable court cases.
The main disadvantages involve cost and finality. Arbitrators and arbitration organizations can charge fees, and those expenses can increase the cost of resolving a dispute. An arbitration agreement can also limit the opportunity to appeal an unfavorable decision because courts generally give substantial deference to arbitration awards.
Faster Resolution and Privacy vs. Limited Appeal Rights
Arbitration can move a dispute through a private process without relying on the full structure of a public court proceeding. The parties can select an arbitrator and establish procedural terms through the agreement or applicable arbitration rules.
Privacy can also matter for businesses handling sensitive contractual or commercial disputes. Unlike a typical court case, arbitration generally does not create the same public court record.
The tradeoff comes with finality. Parties generally have limited grounds for judicial review of an arbitration award. A party should therefore evaluate the arbitration clause before signing, particularly provisions governing the arbitrator, costs, procedures, and appeal rights.
What Makes an Arbitration Agreement Legally Enforceable?
An arbitration agreement must form a valid contract before a court will compel arbitration. Under the Federal Arbitration Act, a written agreement to arbitrate generally carries the same contractual force as other agreements, subject to generally applicable contract defenses.
The parties must agree to arbitration. The agreement also must cover the dispute at issue. A court can examine whether the parties formed an agreement and whether the specific dispute falls within its scope.
Contract defenses can also affect enforcement. Fraud, duress, and unconscionability can provide grounds to challenge an arbitration agreement when applicable law recognizes those defenses.
The agreement should also state its essential terms clearly. Ambiguity over the scope of disputes, selection of the arbitrator, governing rules, or other material terms can create disputes before arbitration even begins.
When Should You Use a Mutual Arbitration Agreement?
A mutual arbitration agreement requires both parties to submit covered disputes to arbitration. Businesses may use mutual arbitration provisions in commercial contracts, employment agreements, and other agreements where the parties want to establish arbitration as the forum for resolving specified disputes.
The decision should follow the relationship and the risks involved. A mutual arbitration agreement can provide a defined process for resolving future disputes and can establish procedures before a conflict arises.
The agreement should match the underlying transaction. Specify the disputes covered, identify the arbitration rules or provider, establish how the arbitrator will be selected, and address costs and attorney fees. Clear terms give both parties a better understanding of their obligations before a dispute develops.
The post What is an Arbitration Agreement? first appeared on Traverse Legal.