Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

When Compliance Says “Do It”, But the Firm Doesn’t

By Doug Cornelius on September 14, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Pay $500,000. Get Censured.

Independent Financial Group was a dually registered broker-dealer and investment adviser. It had investment discretion over at least $100 million in reportable securities under Rule 13f and met the definition of “institutional investment manager” under section 13(f).

The firm reached that threshold in December 2021. That triggers the requirement of filing Form 13F to disclose its holdings. Independent Financial Group did not do so. This continued.

“Throughout this time, Respondent’s Chief Compliance Officers recommended that Respondent comply with Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act by filing Forms 13F, however, no Forms 13F were filed until May 2026.”

Ignore your CCOs, pay the fine.

Sources:

  • In the Matter of the Independent Financial Group
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities, Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • Blog:
    Compliance Building
  • Organization:
    Doug Cornelius
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo