Sometimes disclosure is required; sometimes it is simply smart client communication. The answer turns on the role, the expectations, and whether the change is significant.
A firm hires a freelance lawyer for five hours to research a narrow evidentiary issue. Later, the firm brings in another freelance lawyer to manage discovery and participate in strategy calls for several months. Those two situations are unlikely to feel the same to the client—and the disclosure analysis may be different too.
The legal question is whether this is a significant development
California lawyers must keep clients reasonably informed about significant developments. Hiring outside assistance is not automatically significant. Relevant considerations include how much of the matter the freelance lawyer will handle, whether responsibility for the matter is changing, the type of work involved, what the engagement agreement says, and what the client reasonably expected about staffing.
A behind-the-scenes lawyer who performs a discrete research task under close supervision may not materially change the representation. A lawyer who will handle a major phase of the case, communicate with the client, or replace someone the client specifically selected is much more likely to be a development the client should know about.
The engagement letter can prevent surprises
Firms that regularly use freelance lawyers can address staffing in their engagement agreements. Language explaining that the firm may use qualified contract attorneys or other professionals—subject to supervision and confidentiality obligations—helps align expectations from the beginning. The language should also match the firm’s billing practices.
Disclosure can be simple
When disclosure is appropriate, it does not need to sound alarming: “To keep the matter moving efficiently, we are bringing in an experienced freelance attorney to assist with the discovery responses. I will continue to supervise the matter and remain your primary contact.” That message explains the benefit, the role, and who remains responsible.
Ask three questions
- Will the freelance lawyer perform a significant portion or important aspect of the work?
- Will responsibility, staffing, or client contact differ from what the client was told?
- Would a reasonable client expect to know that an outside lawyer is involved?
The bottom line: not every short research assignment requires a client announcement. But clients dislike surprises. When the freelance lawyer’s involvement is substantial—or disclosure would build trust—a short, clear conversation is often the best approach.
For the detailed legal analysis, read Montage’s original article: Is a Law Firm Required to Notify its Client that it is Using a Freelance Lawyer to Assist on a Matter?
Key links: California Rule 1.4 | Business & Professions Code § 6068 | COPRAC Formal Opinion 2004-165
Need experienced help with a legal project? Contact Montage Legal Group
The post Do You Need to Tell Your Client You Hired a Freelance Lawyer? appeared first on Montage Legal Group.