In Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Perplexity AI, Inc., New York Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave granted in part and denied in part the plaintiffs’ request for additional discovery from Perplexity’s retrieval augmented generation (“RAG”) database and user activity log (“UAL”). Judge Cave ordered Perplexity to provide one additional RAG snapshot and host six months of additional UAL data, rather than the ten months requested. She also required the plaintiffs to contribute $6,000 per month toward hosting the additional UAL data, balancing the discovery’s relevance against the burden and expense of making it available.
The post Additional RAG Snapshot and UAL Data Must Be Produced, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law appeared first on eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin.