Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Advances New Menu Disclosure Requirements and Excludes Supplements from Date Labeling Law

By Kaitlyn Johnson on September 28, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
  • California continues to be a focal point for food and beverage regulation, with lawmakers advancing new disclosure and labeling requirements affecting restaurants, dietary supplements, and other FDA-regulated products.
  • On September 11, 2026, the California Legislature passed SB 869 and sent the measure to Governor Gavin Newsom for consideration. The bill would require chain restaurants and retail food establishments to include a warning label on menus for beverages containing more than 100% of the FDA Daily Value for added sugars. Under FDA nutrition labeling regulations, the Daily Value for added sugars is 50 grams per day for adults and children four years of age and older. 21 CFR 101.9(c)(9). As a result, beverages containing more than 50 grams of added sugar per serving would be subject to the proposed warning requirement.
  • Under the bill, covered beverages would be identified with an added sugar icon displayed clearly and conspicuously adjacent to the menu item. Restaurants would also be required to provide a statement explaining that the icon signifies the beverage contains or exceeds the total daily recommended limit for added sugar.
  • Seperately, on September 25, 2026, Governor Newsom signed AB 2779, which amends California’s food date labeling law to clarify that a “food item for human consumption” does not include a dietary supplement. The amendment modifies AB 660, which took effect on July 1, 2026 and generally requires packaged foods sold in California to use standardized date labeling phrases, including “Best if Used By” for quality-related dates and “Use By” for safety-related dates. As a result, dietary supplements are excluded from the law’s standardized date labeling requirements. The bill includes an urgency clause and became effective immediately upon the Governor’s signature.
  • Keller and Heckman will continue to monitor developments related to California food labeling, dietary supplement regulation, and menu disclosure requirements, including the status of SB 869 and implementation of AB 2779.
Photo of Kaitlyn Johnson Kaitlyn Johnson
Email
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    The Daily Intake
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo