Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AFM consultation on model portfolios and execution only investment services

By Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) & Julia van der Grint on September 30, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On 30 September 2026, the Dutch Authority for Financial Markets (Autoriteit Financiële Markten, AFM) published a consultation on model portfolios for self-directed investing (execution only). The consultation addresses model portfolios as an innovative investment concept, including automatic rebalancing and risk reduction functionalities. Investment firms that offer such model portfolios set up several standard portfolios with different risk profiles, which investors can choose from. According to the AFM, this service aligns with broader European initiatives which aim to increase participation of retail investors in the capital markets.

Market participants requested the AFM to clarify whether model portfolios and functionalities such as automatic rebalancing and automatic risk reduction can be offered as part of the execution-only investment services. The AFM states that in principle, this is possible, but that certain business models may straddle the lines between execution only, investment advice and individual portfolio management.

For offering model portfolio as part of the provision of execution-only services, the AFM maintains three conditions:

  1. The retail investor takes the investment decision independently. Retail investors may develop the expectation that the investment firm provides them with investment advice or individual portfolio management. Therefore, investment firms should clearly explain which service is being provided, that the retail investor must make the investment decision and that the service is not tailored to the specific circumstances of the investor.
  1. The investment firm does not have any discretionary decision-making authority. The composition and rules of the model portfolio are determined in advance at the level of the underlying financial instruments. The investment firm only executes transactions that are required to purchase the model portfolio selected by the investor or to implement predetermined decision rules, which are the rules that determine when and how transactions in the underlying financial instruments of the model portfolio take place.
  1. The investment firm does not provide personalised recommendations. The investment firm is not allowed to state which model portfolio is recommended, appropriate or suitable for an individual investor. The model portfolios must be presented in a neutral manner. The investment firm may, however, provide information about the characteristics, risks, and operation of the model portfolios.

These conditions also apply to automatic rebalancing or automatic risk reduction. The investor must decide independently whether they want to use this functionality, and the conditions must be clear in advance. The investment firm should not independently make a change to a retail investor’s existing model portfolio and should not propose a specific alternative financial instrument to a retail investor, as this may affect the classification of the investment service.

The AFM has described several cases and invites market parties to consider and respond to these cases. Market parties can respond to the consultation until 11 November 2026. The AFM will take the responses into account when preparing its final position. The consultation is available here.

Photo of Floortje Nagelkerke (NL) Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)
Read more about Floortje Nagelkerke (NL)Email
Photo of Julia van der Grint Julia van der Grint

Julia van der Grint is a financial services lawyer based in Amsterdam.

She advises clients on a wide range of regulatory and compliance aspects relevant to financial institutions, such as investment firms, trading platforms, payment institutions, insurers, fund managers and clearing and settlement…

Julia van der Grint is a financial services lawyer based in Amsterdam.

She advises clients on a wide range of regulatory and compliance aspects relevant to financial institutions, such as investment firms, trading platforms, payment institutions, insurers, fund managers and clearing and settlement institutions. Julia has developed particular knowledge of blockchain and cryptocurrencies, and advises crypto-asset services providers, crypto exchanges, payments providers and financial institutions on the regulatory issues related to the deployment of these technologies. She also advises on Dutch licence application and notification requirements and assists companies in their licence or notification processes with the Dutch Authority for Financial Markets and the Dutch Central Bank. Additionally, she assists companies in their contacts with these supervisory authorities and represents companies in enforcement procedures.

In addition, she has previously advised banks, other financial institutions and corporates in an array of transactions, both domestic and cross-border. This includes, among others, advising lenders and lender-groups in corporate restructurings and other insolvency related matters.

Prior to joining the team as an associate, Julia gained experience with the Amsterdam office as a student worker.

Read more about Julia van der GrintEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Global Regulation Tomorrow
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo