Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Commercial Broadcasters March Toward a Second Extension of GMR Interim License

By Karyn K. Ablin & FHH Law on February 13, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo by João Silas courtesy of the Creative Commons License.

Over the past 14 months, we’ve kept our readers updated on the music licensing fight between the Radio Music License Committee (RMLC) and Global Music Rights (GMR). This, of course, started when the two sides couldn’t reach an agreement on the terms of a license that would allow the commercial radio stations represented by the RMLC to perform publicly the musical works in GMR’s catalog.

As the end of 2016 approached without a license in place, those radio stations faced four undesirable alternatives:

  1. pay the fees demanded by GMR (which the RMLC discourages given how high those fees are);
  2. attempt to avoid playing any GMR compositions (which could be hard given the prominent names that figure in GMR’s catalog, the fluid state of that catalog, and the difficulty of clearing performances in commercials and third-party programming);
  3. continue to play GMR music without attempting to negotiate a license (a risky and unadvisable venture given how high infringement damages can run); and
  4. challenge GMR’s anticompetitive conduct in a lawsuit.

As regular CommLawBlog readers know, the RMLC chose no. 4, filing a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Nov. 18, 2016. The complaint was accompanied by a Motion for Preliminary Injunction seeking to prevent GMR from charging commercial radio stations monopoly prices during the pendency of the litigation. The litigation is still ongoing, with the most recent update being a Nov. 29, 2017 recommendation from a United States Magistrate Judge that the RMLC’s antitrust lawsuit be dismissed due to lack of personal jurisdiction over GMR in Pennsylvania and refiled in California. There, GMR responded to RMLC’s suit by filing its own responsive antitrust lawsuit against the RMLC.

Of course, the filing of a lawsuit itself didn’t automatically permit commercial radio stations to perform publicly GMR-represented musical works. But GMR granted that permission in late 2016 when the RMLC and GMR reached an interim license agreement that would allow GMR-represented commercial radio stations to broadcast and webcast GMR music through Sept. 30, 2017, as long as the station opted into the interim license by Jan. 31, 2017. On Aug. 8, 2017, this license was extended for six months – through March 31, 2018 – on the same terms and conditions for any station who opted into the extension by the Sept. 30, 2017 deadline.

As the deadline for this extended interim license now approaches, the RMLC and GMR have agreed on a second extension to Sept. 30, 2018. Like the first extension, the agreement merely continues the interim license under the current terms and conditions (including price).

Unlike the first extension, GMR may take the initiative this time around and contact interim-licensed stations before the beginning of March. According to an RMLC press release issued on Feb. 9, 2018:

GMR has advised RMLC that, beginning no later than March 1, 2018, GMR intends to contact individual stations to offer this interim license extension. If you wish to accept this interim license extension offer but have not heard from GMR by March 1, 2018, please contact GMR directly before your current license expires on March 31, 2018.

If you are a commercial radio station who did opt into the interim license and then extended that license, expect to hear from GMR about this extension. If you find yourself in March without contact from GMR, you should affirmatively reach out to GMR to ensure that your interim license does not expire (which would leave you exposed to liability for copyright infringement if you broadcast or webcast GMR works).

Please feel free to contact us – in March or sooner – if you have any questions.

Photo of Karyn K. Ablin Karyn K. Ablin

Karyn Ablin is a member of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. and specializes in intellectual property issues, especially those relating to music licensing and other copyright-related issues. She has more than two decades of experience representing broadcasters and others before the Copyright Royalty…

Karyn Ablin is a member of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C. and specializes in intellectual property issues, especially those relating to music licensing and other copyright-related issues. She has more than two decades of experience representing broadcasters and others before the Copyright Royalty Board, the ASCAP Rate Court, and other federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. Karyn also counsels clients in issues relating to the use of music and other copyrighted content, especially with regard to the statutory license applicable to webcasting and the use of music by over-the-air broadcasters, satellite radio operators, and telecommunications providers. She also negotiates music licenses and represents clients in music licensing fee disputes and has experience litigating patent, trademark, and non-intellectual property matters, including those before federal regulatory agencies and federal courts.

Ms. Ablin received her law degree from the University of Virginia, where she graduated Order of the Coif and was an Executive Editor of the Virginia Law Review and a member of the Editorial Board of the Virginia Journal of International Law. She graduated with two undergraduate degrees, summa cum laude, from Oral Roberts University, majoring in math and music. She also studied at the Sorbonne in France, Martin Luther University in Germany, and the International Institutes of Law and Social Change in the Netherlands, as well as Northern Arizona University.

Karyn was named by The Legal 500 US as a “recommended lawyer” for copyright law both 2015 and 2016.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Communications, Media & Entertainment
  • Blog:
    CommLawBlog
  • Organization:
    Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo