Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Nothing Deceptive With “Diet” Drinks, Says the Ninth Circuit

By Yinfei Wu on February 25, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a complaint against Dr Pepper alleging that using the word “DIET” in the name “Diet Dr Pepper” was deceptive under California consumer-fraud statutes. The court looked at the complaint’s allegations “taken together,” and held they “fail to sufficiently allege that reasonable consumers read the word ‘diet’ in a soft drink’s brand name to promise weight loss, healthy weight management, or other health benefits.” And “[w]ithout this piece of the puzzle,” the Ninth Circuit concluded, the district court properly dismissed plaintiff Becerra’s consumer-fraud claims.

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Other
  • Blog:
    Incontestable Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo