Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New York is Pro-Choice on Forum Selection Clauses

By Amandeep S. Kahlon on July 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

New York is Pro-Choice on Forum Selection ClausesIn Somerset Fine Home Building, Inc. v. Simplex Industries, Inc., the Appellate Division of the Second Department in New York upheld a dismissal based on the plaintiff’s breach of the parties’ forum selection clause. Somerset Fine Home Building entered into a sales contract with a modular home supplier for the purchase of a home. The sales contract included a forum selection clause specifying Pennsylvania as the location for any lawsuit or arbitration.

Somerset later filed a lawsuit for breach of contract in New York, and the modular home supplier moved to dismiss the suit based on the parties’ forum selection clause. The trial court agreed and dismissed Somerset’s lawsuit. On appeal, Somerset argued the forum selection clause was invalid.

The appellate court rejected Somerset’s argument. Per the appellate court, the forum selection clause was valid and enforceable absent a showing the clause was unreasonable, unjust, in contravention of public policy, or obtained by fraud. Additionally, the clause could be invalidated if Somerset showed that the selected forum imposed such great difficulty or expense on Somerset that Somerset would be practically deprived of access to a court. The appellate court found Somerset failed to provide any evidence that would satisfy the requirements for invalidating the party’s forum choice provision. Without such a showing, freedom of contract prevailed, and the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s dismissal.

Lessons from Somerset

Forum selection clauses can be overlooked during the contracting process, especially when such provisions are part of form terms and conditions attached to a purchase order or supply agreement. The result in Somerset, even though it is a consumer case, should be a reminder to review forum selection clauses carefully before executing any agreement. This can be especially true in complex construction projects involving multiple layers of contracts, subcontracts, purchase orders and other agreements, where consistency in forum selection across contracts can be important in managing disputes involving multiple parties on a project.

Note, some states have passed legislation to bar forum selection clauses that provide for out-of-state resolution of construction disputes, so you should also be aware of that potential consideration when negotiating over choice of forum. If you have any questions about forum selection clauses or contract issues in general, please feel free to contact Aman Kahlon.

Photo of Amandeep S. Kahlon Amandeep S. Kahlon

Aman Kahlon represents owners, general contractors, and subcontractors. His experience ranges over a wide variety of disputes. He advises clients on delay, interference, defective design, and negligence claims. Aman also devotes a significant portion of his practice to contract review, drafting and negotiation…

Aman Kahlon represents owners, general contractors, and subcontractors. His experience ranges over a wide variety of disputes. He advises clients on delay, interference, defective design, and negligence claims. Aman also devotes a significant portion of his practice to contract review, drafting and negotiation; contract and claims administration; and lien and bond law issues.

Additionally, Aman has substantial compliance experience in consumer financial services. He has assisted in the development of audit testing programs and foreclosure policies and procedures for several clients. He also regularly participates in the auditing and remediation of clients’ foreclosure practices.

Read more about Amandeep S. KahlonEmailAman's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    BuildSmart
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo