Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

January 1, 2021: The Deadline for Hospitals to Make Transparency Clear

By Kirk S. Davis & Danielle C. Gordet on December 28, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Hospitals that are not ready for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) new transparency requirement must act quickly. CMS has advised that the new year will begin with new auditing and monitoring of these requirements.

Effective January 1, 2021, hospitals operating in the United States are required to have detailed pricing information prominently displayed on their websites. They must post their standard charges online. Standard charges are “the regular rate[s] established by the hospital for an item or service provided to a specific group of paying patients.” (45 CFR §180.20). These include the hospital’s gross charges, payer-specific negotiated charges, de-identified minimum and maximum negotiated charges, and discounted cash prices. The information must be posted online through both of the following formats:

  • Machine Readable File: A single digital file containing the standard charges provided by the hospital
  • Consumer Friendly Display of “Shoppable” Services: A consumer-friendly display of 300 shoppable services (services that can be scheduled in advance), or as many as the hospital provides if it is less than 300

CMS has made clear that they will begin auditing compliance with the transparency requirements beginning on the rule’s effective date – January 1, 2021. Monitoring activities may include evaluating complaints made by individuals to CMS and audits of hospital websites. If hospitals are found non-compliant with the rule, any of the following actions may be taken, which generally will occur in this order:

  • Warning Notice: A written warning notice to the hospital of the specific violation(s)
  • Corrective Action Plan (CAP) Request: Issuance of a CAP if noncompliance constitutes a material violation of one or more requirements
  • Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP): Imposition of a CMP (not in excess of $300 per day) and publicization of the penalty on a CMS website if the hospital fails to respond to the request to submit a CAP or comply with the requirements of a CAP

CMS is sending a strong message that consumers have a right to understand the cost of their care before the care is provided. Hospitals will be held accountable for failing to provide transparent pricing information.

Photo of Kirk S. Davis Kirk S. Davis

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all…

An accomplished litigator, Kirk Davis represents hospitals and health systems in complex regulatory compliance issues and disputes with a focus on medical malpractice and peer review hearings. Kirk has decades of experience in the peer review process and has been involved in all aspects of hearings, from prosecuting physicians to defending medical staff and serving as a hearing officer. He helps hospitals comply with federal and state laws by recommending peer review best practices and procedures. In addition to his work on medical malpractice matters, Kirk handles disputes between physicians in private practices and effectively resolves contentious medical practice dissolution through alternative dispute resolution. Kirk has served as an arbitrator in various healthcare-related matters and is a sought after speaker on health law topics. He is Board Certified in Health Law by The Florida Bar and recognized by Chambers USA as a leading lawyer in healthcare.

Read more about Kirk S. DavisEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Danielle C. Gordet Danielle C. Gordet

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel…

Danielle Gordet focuses her practice on healthcare, including healthcare compliance, conflicts of interest, scope of practice issues, physician contracting, and regulations. Her ability to identify, investigate, and resolve complex issues in collaboration with healthcare administrators allows her to provide them with effective counsel in developing policies and procedures which reduce the risk of inappropriate conduct and prevent non-compliance. She provides expertise on federal and state healthcare statutory and regulatory issues, including adherence to the Stark Law, the Anti-Kickback Statute, and licensure compliance. In addition, Danielle assists manufacturers of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulated products in obtaining necessary FDA clearances for their devices. Danielle works with healthcare administrators on resolving a variety of legal matters, including issues surrounding hospital bylaws, licensure and credentialing, telemedicine, codes of conduct, and Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. On behalf of healthcare providers, she negotiates and drafts contractual agreements including medical directorships, physician employment, clinical trials, and consulting arrangements.

Read more about Danielle C. GordetEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory, Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law Rx
  • Organization:
    Akerman LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo