Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Write the Rules on Employer Health Care Reform Penalties

By Monique Warren on May 5, 2011
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Write the Rules on Employer Health Care Reform Penalties

Employers now have an opportunity to influence how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s “employer responsibility” “assessable payment” will apply in 2014. 

 

Section 4980H of the Internal Revenue Code, added by the PPACA, imposes a penalty on employers with more than 50 full-time employees if at least one full-time employee obtains subsidized “exchange” health coverage and the employer does not offer its full-time employees group health plan coverage or the coverage offered fails the PPACA’s affordability or value tests. 

 

The Internal Revenue Service issued Notice 2011-36 on May 3, inviting public comments on approaches the IRS is considering for regulations implementing the employer-penalty provision, as well as other PPACA provisions.  The Notice suggests potential approaches for, among other things, determining which employees are “full-time.”  It also invites comments on the interpretation of the 90-day limitation on group health plan eligibility waiting periods and coordination of that provision with the employer-penalty provision.

 

Comments from employers and employer groups have helped shape the legal and regulatory landscape that affects them.  Despite the PPACA’s primary enforcement agencies’ tendency, so far, to issue final regulations without a public comment opportunity, employer groups already have had significant influence on the curtailment and delay of certain regulations.  (For example, the IRS’ decision to delay enforcement of the new nondiscrimination provisions for insured group health plans.)  Also, employers and employer groups influenced Congress’ decision to repeal the PPACA’s “free choice voucher” provisions, which would have required employers to pay for certain employees’ health exchange coverage. 

 

Here’s an opportunity for employers and employer groups to voice their opinions on a significant regulation.  Our Government Relations practice regularly assists employers and employer groups to prepare comments on proposed regulations. It can pay to speak up!             

Photo of Monique Warren Monique Warren

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health…

Monique Warren is a principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She counsels employers on employee benefits compliance and administrative matters, represents employers to government agencies, and prepares plan documents and related employee communications.

Monique’s expertise includes health and welfare plans as well as retirement plans. She has extensive experience helping plan sponsors navigate COBRA, HIPAA, and other ERISA and Internal Revenue Code provisions and correct compliance issues. A significant part of her practice currently focuses on defending employers in federal investigations of their group health plans as well as assisting government contractors with fulfilling fringe benefit obligations. She also has extensive experience helping retirement plan sponsors comply with ERISA fiduciary requirements and the Code’s qualification requirements and correcting plan errors under the Department of Labor’s and Internal Revenue Service’s voluntary correction programs.

Read more about Monique WarrenEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Benefits Law Advisor
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo