Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Banks and Credit Unions Utilizing Ineffective Chatbots May Risk Violating Federal Law

By Jonathan R. Kolodziej & John Thomas Mostellar III on February 1, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Banks and Credit Unions Utilizing Ineffective Chatbots May Risk Violating Federal Law

In an October 2023 advisory opinion, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) put large banks and credit unions on notice that the use of chatbots and other technologies could increase the risk of violating federal law if those services are ineffective. As we have previously written about, the CFPB’s advisory opinion interprets Section 1034(c) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), which generally requires certain financial institutions to respond to a consumer’s request for information concerning a consumer financial product or service in a timely manner. The statute applies to “insured depository institutions and credit unions that offer or provide consumer financial products or services and that have total assets of more than $10 billion.”

While the focus of the advisory opinion is the CFPB’s view that charging fees in connection with information requests unreasonably impedes consumers’ ability to request and receive account information, there are numerous other aspects of the advisory opinion that are notable and worth addressing. While it did not take up much space in the actual opinion, one important piece is how the use of emerging technologies, particularly chatbots, could pose risk to large banks and credit unions when it comes to compliance with Section 1034(c).

Keeping with the rationale that unreasonably impeding a consumer’s ability to request and receive account information would be a violation of Section 1034(c), the CFPB explains that “[l]arge banks and credit unions may violate section 1034(c) if they employ technologies that do not properly recognize consumer information requests or that provide inaccurate or incomplete information in response to those requests.” The CFPB cautions that “the absence of appropriate checks and quality assurance processes” can result in requests that are inadvertently misdirected or responses that are inadequate.

That is not to suggest that large banks or credit unions should necessarily steer clear of new technologies or shy away from the use of chatbots. The CFPB acknowledges that “[c]hatbots or other automated responses may serve to expedite responses in some cases.” However, understanding that those technologies can introduce risk when they aren’t operating properly is important and should result in large banks and credit unions focusing more on these services in the short and long term. To ensure that the potential risk of violating Section 1034(c) is mitigated, covered entities must ensure that interactive technologies are properly structured and are monitored over time so that they facilitate consumer requests for information and do not inhibit them.

Even though Section 1034(c) has been operative since the CFPA was signed into law by President Barack Obama in July 2010, this advisory opinion is the CFPB’s first guidance regarding the law and, to date, no supervisory findings or enforcement actions have been issued or pursued related to Section 1043(c). However, the CFPB noted in its advisory opinion that “[a]s a matter of prosecutorial discretion, the CFPB does not intend to seek monetary relief for potential violations of section 1034(c) that occur prior to February 1, 2024.” Therefore, large banks and credit unions should take the time now to validate how existing technologies are performing and recognize that consumer requests for information submitted through a chatbot or other form of interactive technology are likely to implicate federal law.

Photo of Jonathan R. Kolodziej Jonathan R. Kolodziej

Jonathan Kolodziej represents all types of consumer financial service providers in regulatory compliance, examination and enforcement matters. Through this work, he has assisted bank and non-bank mortgage servicers, mortgage originators, debt collectors, depository institutions, credit card issuers, small dollar lenders, reverse mortgage companies…

Jonathan Kolodziej represents all types of consumer financial service providers in regulatory compliance, examination and enforcement matters. Through this work, he has assisted bank and non-bank mortgage servicers, mortgage originators, debt collectors, depository institutions, credit card issuers, small dollar lenders, reverse mortgage companies, investment firms, and various industry trade associations.

Read more about Jonathan R. KolodziejEmailJonathan's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of John Thomas Mostellar III John Thomas Mostellar III

Tom Mostellar is an associate in the firm’s Banking and Financial Services Practice Group.

Tom received his J.D. (magna cum laude) from Tulane University School of Law, where he was an articles editor for the Tulane Law Review. He has…

Tom Mostellar is an associate in the firm’s Banking and Financial Services Practice Group.

Tom received his J.D. (magna cum laude) from Tulane University School of Law, where he was an articles editor for the Tulane Law Review. He has a B.S. in Business Administration from Washington & Lee University.

Read more about John Thomas Mostellar IIIEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Financial Services Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo