Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

The United States Intervenes in its First False Claims Act Cybersecurity Case

By Taylor Sample on April 12, 2024
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Hacker binary attack code. Made with Canon 5d Mark III and analog vintage lens, Leica APO Macro Elmarit-R 2.8 100mm (Year: 1993)
Markus Spiske, Unsplash

The United States notified the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia that it plans to intervene in a False Claims Act case filed against Georgia Tech Research Corporation (Georgia Tech) by its Associate Director of Cybersecurity and former Principal Information Security Engineer (the relators). 

Georgia Tech is a party to “hundreds” of contracts with the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), which grants Georgia Tech access to certain Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) that must be protected by “adequate” security, which, at minimum, must satisfy the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).   The relators allege that: (1) Georgia Tech’s internal assessors assigned to determine compliance with NIST were not qualified; (2) the assessors failed to compile sufficient evidence to prove compliance with the standards; (3) the assessors and administrators faced pressures and conflicts of interest; and (3) Georgia Tech bypassed certain malware requirements, in violation of NIST.  As a result, the relators claim Georgia Tech’s self-attestations of NIST compliance were false.

The relators further allege that they raised these issues of noncompliance internally over the course of several months without satisfaction but instead faced “increasing retaliation,” including poor performance reviews and forced resignation.

The relators originally filed the case under seal in July 2022.  After more than a year and a half of investigation, the United States notified the court of its decision to intervene.  The United States has until June 24, 2024, to serve its Complaint in Intervention.  The decision to intervene is yet another sign of increased attention and enforcement under the Department of Justice’s Civil Cyber-Fraud Initiative, which we have written about previously.

If you have any questions about the case or cybersecurity enforcement under the False Claims Act, please contact the author.

Photo of Taylor Sample Taylor Sample

Taylor Sample focuses his practice on representing clients in government actions, investigations and related litigation, particularly involving the False Claims Act, Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute. Taylor has assisted corporate clients with internal compliance assessments and investigations regarding regulatory compliance issues.

Read more about Taylor SampleEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Inside the False Claims Act
  • Organization:
    Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo