Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New Year, Updated List: The U.S. Department of Defense Updates Its List of Chinese Military Companies with Ancillary Supply Chain and USG Contracting Impacts

By Adelicia R. Cliffe & Alexandra Barbee-Garrett on January 14, 2025
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Table of Contents

  • Who is a DoD Designated “Chinese military company”?
  • What Happens if an Entity is on the 1260H List?
  • What to Look for Going Forward

On January 2, 2025, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) updated the 1260H List of entities identified as “Chinese military companies” (CMC) operating in the United States, as required by section 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Section 1260H), adding new entities and removing others.  The updated 1260H List now includes 76 entities. 

Link to Who is a DoD Designated “Chinese military company”? Who is a DoD Designated “Chinese military company”?

Section 1260H defines a “Chinese military company” as an entity (i) owned or controlled by, or acting as an agent of or on behalf of the People’s Liberation Army or any other component of the Central Military Commission of the Chinese Communist Party, or (ii) that is a “military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base,” and, in both cases, is engaged in providing commercial services, manufacturing, producing, or exporting. What constitutes a “military-civil fusion contributor to the Chinese defense industrial base” is based upon one of multiple criteria related to an entity’s cooperation or dealings with the Chinese government.

Since June 2021, when DoD first published the 1260H List, DoD has made a number of additions to and, in fewer instances, removed entities from, the 1260H List. Here, DoD added at least 70 and removed six entities from the 1260H List.   

The 1260H-specific prohibitions are in addition to and distinct from the previously enacted prohibitions on CXMT and CATL that will go into effect starting in 2027.  Those restrictions will bar the government from purchasing or using semiconductor products and services from CXMT, effective on December 23, 2027 (per the FY 2023 NDAA, section 5949), and will bar DoD from purchasing CATL batteries, effective on October 1, 2027 (per the FY 2024 NDAA, section 154).

New Process to Challenge Designation

The updated 1260H List is also significant because it includes, for the first time, instructions to request “reconsideration” of an entity’s 1260H List designation.  The reconsideration process, likely created in response to recent litigation challenging the validity of certain 1260H List designations, requires an entity seeking reconsideration to submit a “detailed description” with supporting evidence of why it should be removed from the 1260H List.  This reconsideration process comports with the new requirement for DoD to provide written justification for any addition to or removal from the 1260H List, enacted in section 1346 of the FY 2025 NDAA.

Link to What Happens if an Entity is on the 1260H List? What Happens if an Entity is on the 1260H List?

While Section 1260H does not itself implement any prohibitions for identified companies, other notable prohibitions rely on the 1260H List.

  • Effects for Research Institutions. DoD in a June 2023 memorandum notified research institutions that receive DoD funding for fundamental research projects (such as universities, research and development facilities, and laboratories) that DoD’s funding decisions will now require or recommend that such institutions implement mitigation measures if the research institution or individuals involved in DoD-funded research also have associations or affiliations with entities on the 1260H List.
  • Prohibition on DoD Procuring Goods and Services from Section 1260H List. Section 805 of FY 2024 NDAA, once implemented, will prohibit DoD from directly or indirectly procuring end products and services from an entity on the 1260H List.  The direct and indirect prohibitions go into effect on June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027, respectively.  The prohibitions do not extend to purchases of goods, services, or technology that connect goods or services to third party services (e.g., interconnection), and the indirect prohibition does not apply to components, defined broadly as an item supplied to the federal government as part of an end item or of another component.
  • Prohibition on DoD Contracting with Entities that Contract with Lobbyists for Entities on the 1260 List. Section 851 of the FY 2025 NDAA prohibits DoD from entering into contracts with any company (or the company’s parent or subsidiary) that has a contract with any entity that engages in “lobbying activities” (as defined under the Lobbying Disclosure Act) for an entity on the 1260H List.  The prohibition takes effect June 30, 2026.  The Joint Explanatory Statement accompanying the FY 2025 NDAA makes clear that Section 851 is yet another measure to give teeth to the 1260H List.  The Statement also appears to connect Section 851 to section 812 of the FY 2024 NDAA (which prohibits consulting firms from working with certain identified foreign entities but did not explicitly list entities on the 1260H List) by requiring GAO to develop a report of the national security risks posed by consulting firms who simultaneously contract with DoD and the Chinese government or its proxies or affiliates and to include DoD’s measures to restrict and enforce contractual terms related to conflicts of interest.

Relatedly, while not a formal prohibition, most screening providers include the 1260H List in their standard screening packages.  Dealings with entities on the 1260H List will often invite questions from other companies’ compliance teams when they are made aware, and transactions with entities on the 1260H List or those who deal with them could be delayed.

Link to What to Look for Going Forward What to Look for Going Forward

Congress has targeted entities on the 1260H List, and will likely continue to do so, meaning that Congress could impose new restrictions on entities on the 1260H List and harmonize the 1260H List with U.S. sanctions and export restricted party lists.  Congress considered, but did not enact, several such measures in the last Congress, including proposals to impose asset-freezing sanctions on the 1260H List, cross-list 1260H List designated entities on sanctions and export restricted party lists, prohibit certain battery procurements from 1260H List entities, and bar security exchanges from listing securities issued by 1260H List entities.  In addition, Congress has called for prohibitions on investment in 1260H List entities.  Whether these measures will be reintroduced in the 119thCongress is unclear, but we anticipate that Congress and the Trump administration will make China a significant focus and seek to use the Section 1260H List to greater effect.

Photo of Adelicia R. Cliffe Adelicia R. Cliffe

Adelicia Cliffe is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office, a member of the Steering Committee for the firm’s Government Contracts Group, and a member of the International Trade Group. Addie is also co-chair of the firm’s National Security practice. Addie has been…

Adelicia Cliffe is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office, a member of the Steering Committee for the firm’s Government Contracts Group, and a member of the International Trade Group. Addie is also co-chair of the firm’s National Security practice. Addie has been named as a nationally recognized practitioner in the government contracts field by Chambers USA.

Read more about Adelicia R. CliffeEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Alexandra Barbee-Garrett Alexandra Barbee-Garrett

Alexandra Barbee-Garrett is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, where she practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Alex helps companies navigate the complex requirements around doing business with the U.S. government, with a particular focus on government contracts and grants

…

Alexandra Barbee-Garrett is a counsel in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office, where she practices in the Government Contracts Group.

Alex helps companies navigate the complex requirements around doing business with the U.S. government, with a particular focus on government contracts and grants compliance issues, government ethics, and lobbying laws. Her practice spans a broad range of counseling, investigatory, and litigation matters, including: compliance reviews and enhancing contractor compliance programs; representing clients in suspension and debarment proceedings; counseling on supply chain security and sourcing issues; voluntary and mandatory disclosures; internal investigations related to the False Claims Act, the Procurement Integrity Act, and other civil and criminal matters; and bid protest and claim litigation. Alex also helps clients understand developing legislative requirements in the supply chain and government contracting spaces.

Prior to joining Crowell & Moring, Alex was a law clerk to Judge Richard A. Hertling of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Before law school, Alex worked as a health care legislative assistant for Rep. Rick Larsen (WA) in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Read more about Alexandra Barbee-GarrettEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial, Government Contracts
  • Blog:
    Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo