Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

NDGa – Court cannot reimpose stay under Section 105 to impair or create new rights

By Sunghee Sohn on December 26, 2005
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

11 U.S.C. §105; 11 U.S.C. 362(l); FRBP 7001
In re Tucker, 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 2679 (No. 05-15001) (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2005)(Drake).
The Court would not use its broad equitable powers to re-impose the automatic stay in order to allow the debtor to tender one month rent to her landlord and pay the remainder of her arrearage through her Chapter 13 plan. To do so would subvert the clear provisions of §362, as amended in 2005, and would impair rights or create additional rights not provided for in the Code. The debtor did not exhibit the intent or ability to cure within the thirty-day period after the filing of the petition, and her request for injunctive relief should have been filed as an adversary proceeding.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Georgia Bankruptcy Blog
  • Organization:
    The Law Office of Scott B. Riddle
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo