Skip to main content

Global Regulation Tomorrow

Geopolitical risk and the CRD 6 / CRR 3

By Simon Lovegrove (UK), Floortje Nagelkerke (NL), Sebastien Praicheux, Jochen Vester (UK), Michael Born (DE), Dorothée Ciolino

Neither the CRR 3 nor the CRD 6 introduce a new stand-alone Pillar capital charge labelled ‘geopolitical risk’. Instead, geopolitical risk is recognized and embedded in the new prudential framework in certain ways including:

  • Heightened prudential expectations around “geopolitical and trade risks”.
  • Impact on capital, exposures, and modelling under CRR 3.
  • The expansion of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risk requirements (including geopolitical drivers).

There are also certain indirect geopolitical components including the third country branch requirement.

This briefing note examines these elements.

Originally published at regulationtomorrow.com

Citation

Simon Lovegrove (UK), Floortje Nagelkerke (NL), Sebastien Praicheux, Jochen Vester (UK), Michael Born (DE), Dorothée Ciolino, Geopolitical risk and the CRD 6 / CRR 3, Global Regulation Tomorrow (April 23, 2026) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-W1B21BHB, lexpid.org/W1B21BHB]

View the record

Filed under