Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New FDA Guidance Document on Registration and Product Listing for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments Published

By Azim Chowdhury on September 18, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Just two weeks before the September 30, 2017 registration deadline for U.S. tobacco product manufacturing establishments, on Friday, September 15, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a Revised Guidance for Industry on Registration and Product Listing for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments .See our original Client Alert summarizing the registration requirements here.

Has the Deadline Changed?

No. Registrations and product listings are still due by September 30, 2017 for U.S. manufacturing establishments. This applies to deemed tobacco products marketed as of August 8, 2016, the effective date of the Deeming Regulation.

How Do I Register?

FDA strongly encourages electronic submission of establishment registrations and product listings through the FDA Unified Registration and Listing System (FURLS) which can be accessed here. FURLS is only used to register an establishment and submit a product listing. Do not confuse this with the CTP Portal, which you can use to submit other regulatory document (e.g.,ingredient reports, health document submissions, etc.) To obtain a FURLS account and to view more instructions and webinars see here. Alternatively, you may file your Establishment Registration manually by filling out and Form FDA 3741a and mailing all of the necessary materials to CTP’s Document Control Center.

View FDA’s latest Webinar “Using the Tobacco Registration and Listing Module of FURLS – Tips and Recent Enhancements” here (published September 18, 2017).

Who Registers their Establishments and Submits Product Listing Information?

The revised guidance clarifies that owners and operators of domestic U.S. establishments engaged in manufacturing regulated tobacco products are required to register and provide a product list to FDA. This requirement does not extend to foreign establishments (e.g., e-vapor device manufacturers in China) or U.S. importers, distributors or retailers who merely distribute and sell products, but are not engaged in any manufacturing activity (e.g., manufacture, preparation, compounding, or processing, including bottling, packaging and labeling). FDA also encourages establishment owners to act as the agent for all operators and to register all establishments it owns and to submit the associated product listing, in order to reduce redundant submissions. If you have any questions about how to best structure your registration and product listing for your particular business, please let us know.

What Products Need to be Listed?

Despite the fact that the Form 3741a and the template FURLS product listing spreadsheet provided by FDA allow companies to indicate whether a particular product is for “Consumer Use” or “Further Manufacturing”, FDA’s revised guidance clarifies that the listing requirement only applies to finished tobacco products sealed in final packaging intended for consumers use. This includes components and parts sold directly to consumers in final sealed packaging. For example, an e-liquid sold in a sealed bottle for use by consumers in an open-system device would be a finished tobacco product, but an e-liquid intended to be filled into a closed system cigalike would be for further manufacturing, and should not be listed.
 
What Information Should be Submitted as Part of Establishment Registration and Product Listing?

Registration Information
The following information is needed to register manufacturing establishments:
  • The name and full address of each establishment engaged in manufacturing the registrant owns or operates, as of the date of registration.
  • The name and places of business of the owner or operator. In the case of a partnership, include the name of each partner. In the case of a corporation, include the name of each corporate officer and director, and the State of incorporation.

Optional information includes an email address and a Data Universal Numbering System (D-U-N-S) number or other unique identifier (codes) for the place of business of the owner, the place of business of the operator, and the location of the establishment.

Product Listing Information

For the product list, FDA’s template product listing spreadsheet (available in FURLS) should be used, particularly if you are processing the registration online through FURLS. The spreadsheet identifies the information that must be submitted for each product, e.g., product identification number (SKU), intended use (consumer use), product category (ENDS), subcategory (e-liquid), open/closed system, flavor, and advertising, labeling and consumer information. Please note that each unique product must be identified on your product list including, for example, e-liquids under the same brand or flavor that vary in terms of package (e.g., bottle) size, nicotine strength and/or Propylene Glycol (PG)/Vegetable Glycerin (VG) ratio.

Do I need to submit labels for all my product variations?

In addition, the product listing must include labeling information, but FDA’s revised guidance clarifies that e-liquid manufacturers in particular need not submit labels for all product variations. Specifically, the guidance states (on page 9):

However, FDA recognizes that product listing for some tobacco products may result in numerous labeling submissions that the manufacturer must prepare and submit. For example, variations in package size, nicotine strength, Propylene Glycol (PG)/Vegetable Glycerin (VG) ratio, and flavor can result in thousands of individual product labeling submissions. 

In order to reduce the amount of uploaded labeling submissions, FDA does not, at this time, intend to enforce the requirements that owners and operators submit the labeling for each individual listed tobacco product if the registrant submits the information that represents the labeling for a selected line of products. In deciding whether a registrant’s submitted information falls within this compliance policy, FDA may consider whether the tobacco products’ labeling is essentially identical (e.g., the same formatting, fonts, colors, background text, and images) and whether the variations are limited to package size, nicotine strength, PG/VG ratio, and flavor. However, we recommend that zero nicotine formulas of a product, or product line, be grouped separately from products with nicotine. 

Rather, as described in Appendix A to the revised guidance, registrants may submit a separate “package label plan”, which is a model/generic product label with placeholder text for the specific variations, along with a “product variation index” which lists all the variations for a specific product, e.g. package size, nicotine strength, PG/VG ratio and flavor. The product variation index must list all combinations of the variations that will be using the model label. The examples from FDA’s revised guidance are copied below.

The Package Label Plans, including the Model/Generic Labels and Product Variation Indices can be uploaded in FURLS by creating a single PDF containing the label and the index. Once uploaded into FURLS you will be given the option of associating the file with all applicable products.

Example A – Sample Model Label (Package Label Plan) for nicotine containing products from the revised FDA guidance:
Example A – Product Variation Index
Example B – Sample Model Label (Package Label Plan) for 0 mg nicotine products from the revised FDA guidance:
Example B – Product Variation Index
What about advertisements and “consumer information”?
 

Finally, we note that despite previously implying that this information was optional, FDA’s revised guidance states that if product advertising exists, a representative sampling of such advertisements must be provided with the product listing. FDA interprets “a representative sampling of advertisements” to mean typical advertising material that reflects the full range of promotional statements made for the tobacco product. For example, if more than one magazine advertisement is used, but the promotional content is essentially identical, only one need be submitted.

FDA’s revised guidance further notes that, in addition, the product listing must include “a copy of all consumer information” to the extent the information is not advertising and has not already been provided as a form of product labeling. Consumer information does not include information directed at wholesalers, distributors or retailers where such information is not available to consumers (e.g., product specifications intended for manufacturing purposes, photos of components or parts not intended for individual sale, or communications between companies), but may include items like consumer brochures.

If you are interested in obtaining additional guidance on this topic contact Azim Chowdhury (202.434.4230, chowdhury@khlaw.com) or Ben Wolf (202-434-4103, wolf@khlaw.com). For more information on our Tobacco and E-vapor Practice in general, visit www.khlaw.com/evapor. Follow Keller and Heckman Tobacco and E-Vapor Partner Azim Chowdhury on Twitter.

Photo of Azim Chowdhury Azim Chowdhury

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of…

Azim Chowdhury is a regulatory and public policy attorney with a focus on vapor, nicotine and tobacco product regulation. He is a Partner in Keller and Heckman’s nationally-ranked food and drug law practice.

Mr. Chowdhury advises domestic and foreign corporations in matters of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and international regulatory compliance. In particular, he has developed expertise in tobacco and vapor product regulation relating to the implementation of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and spearheaded the Tobacco and E-Vapor practice at Keller and Heckman. Specifically, Mr. Chowdhury has experience representing tobacco, e-cigarette and e-liquid manufacturers, distributors, retailers, suppliers and trade associations in matters of FDA, state and global regulatory compliance. He also assists corporations in establishing clearances for food and drug additives in the U.S., Canada, and European Union, with an emphasis on indirect additives used in food-contact materials.

Mr. Chowdhury has authored and edited numerous articles and publications, including Tobacco Regulation and Compliance: An Essential Resource, FDA Regulation of Tobacco: A Comprehensive Guide – An FDLI Primer and Tobacco and Nicotine Delivery: Regulation and Compliance, 2nd Edition. He is a frequent contributor to the Food and Drug Law Institute’s (FDLI) Update Magazine and has served on the Editorial Advisory Board of the Food and Drug Law Journal.  In addition, he has been interviewed in the U.S. News and World Reports Best Lawyers Edition (2016) and was named one of “10 Names to Know in the Vape World” in the October 2015 issue of Vape Magazine. Mr. Chowdhury received the 2018 National Law Review Go-To Thought Leadership Award for his consistent coverage of the emerging issues surrounding vaping and e-cigarettes on Keller and Heckman’s law blog, The Continuum of Risk.  As an industry leader, Mr. Chowdhury frequently speaks at industry conferences and events.

Mr. Chowdhury also has an active pro bono practice through Keller and Heckman’s Pro Bono Program, and has been featured in the Baltimore Sun for successfully obtaining asylum in the United States for a family who fled their home country of El Salvador because of violence they faced from an international gang.

Prior to entering private practice, he served as a judicial law clerk on the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Mr. Chowdhury received a B.A. and B.S. from Johns Hopkins University, a MBA from the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business, and a JD, cum laude, from the University of Maryland School of Law.

Education: Johns Hopkins University (B.A., B.S., 2003); University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business (M.B.A., 2006); University of Maryland School of Law (J.D., 2006, cum laude).

Admissions: District of Columbia; Maryland

Read more about Azim ChowdhuryEmailAzim's Linkedin ProfileAzim's Twitter Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    The Continuum of Risk
  • Organization:
    Keller Heckman
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo