Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Cert Petition Denied in Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood

By Alison L. Nadel & Paul M. Thompson on May 19, 2015
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In a previous post, we discussed the petition for certiorari in Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of Los Angeles (S. Ct. No. 14-4080), a False Claims Act (FCA) case in which the relator alleged that Planned Parenthood knowingly overcharged the government for contraceptives it provided to low-income individuals in California.

In Gonzalez, the Ninth Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed the relator’s claims because documents attached to the complaint showed that the government knew about Planned Parenthood’s allegedly improper billing practices; thus, the relator could not demonstrate the requisite scienter under the FCA. The relator argued that the issue of government knowledge was worthy of Supreme Court consideration due to a split between the Ninth Circuit and other circuits on this issue.

We opined that Relator’s cert petition did not raise an issue worthy of consideration by the Supreme Court. Consistent with our expectation, the Supreme Court denied the cert petition on May 18, 2015.

Photo of Alison L. Nadel Alison L. Nadel

Alison Nadel has successfully represented clients in arbitrations, class actions and other complex litigation. Her broad experience includes intellectual property cases involving allegations of patent infringement, trademark and copyright infringement, and unfair competition, as well as complex commercial contract disputes, business tort matters…

Alison Nadel has successfully represented clients in arbitrations, class actions and other complex litigation. Her broad experience includes intellectual property cases involving allegations of patent infringement, trademark and copyright infringement, and unfair competition, as well as complex commercial contract disputes, business tort matters, public accommodation disputes involving the Americans with Disabilities Act, state accessibility laws and related tort claims, administrative law cases, and defense of qui tam litigation involving state and federal False Claims Acts. Read Alison Nadel’s full bio.

Read more about Alison L. NadelEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Paul M. Thompson Paul M. Thompson

Paul M. Thompson focuses his practice on white-collar criminal defense, congressional investigations and appellate matters. He is a current member of the Firm-wide Management Committee and a former member of the Firm’s Executive Committee. From 2011 to 2015, Paul served as partner-in-charge of…

Paul M. Thompson focuses his practice on white-collar criminal defense, congressional investigations and appellate matters. He is a current member of the Firm-wide Management Committee and a former member of the Firm’s Executive Committee. From 2011 to 2015, Paul served as partner-in-charge of the Washington, DC office. Read Paul M. Thompson’s full bio.

Read more about Paul M. ThompsonEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    FCA Update
  • Organization:
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo